I'm a regular to the ENO and thought the production was marvellous (although this may in part have been due to my extremely low expectations having read the reviews beforehand). The rest of my party also loved it. I thought the translation was excellent, as clearly did the rest of the audience - and I have to add it was the most electric audience atmosphere I've ever encountered at an opera. The enjoyment was virtually palpable. To the guy who prefers Da Ponte: why were you at the ENO?? Opera should be for entertaining the masses, as originally intended, not for pandying to libretto-snobs like you - go back to the RHO! - ravenwoman
30 Nov 10
Thanks for commenting, David, but you do something that's quite common - tell other people why they haven't liked something you have. As far as I can see, no-one here has said they didn't like Don Giovanni because it didn't fit into their preconceptions. The best productions do things completely differently to anything you've seen before but this, for me, wasn't one of them. I loved Idomeneo, by the way.
- Simon Thomas
29 Nov 10
While accepting that some elements probably looked better on paper than in reality and the dance in Act 2 was very lack-lustre, not all people who visit opera are steeped in the 18th century tradition and can therefore approach new performances with no preconceptions / expectations. These people, such as my lady who accompanied me, thoroughly enjoyed it. She also enjoyed Idomeneo which was given poor reviews, and Pearl Fishers which fared better being a more standard production (and with Alfie Boe). Perhaps the more versions one sees could also open the mind and allow us to simply enjoy performances for what they are rather than how we think they should be - and if this helps newcomers understand the storyline before seeing a standard production in Italian, then surely this is a bonus. And before you ask, yes I personally go to opera regularly and therefore also appreciate standard performances. Loosen up!! - David Carr
24 Nov 10
Rebecca Evans stands out as Donna Elvira and earns the show a second star (for me) all by herself. For the rest, Norris and MacNeil seem determined to uglify Mozart and Jeremy Sams's translation is a lowest common denominator by-the-rhyming-dictionary piece of work. Well, they all know better than Da Ponte and the composer I suppose. Bloody foreigners, eh? - Job
24 Nov 10
The constant moving of bits of dangerous-looking scenery over which the characters had to climb, the shallow gimmickery that pervaded every scene and the extraneous non-singing characters who did likewise made this one of the worst productions of DG that I have ever seen.
I shall make sure that I watch out for Mr Norris's next venture into opera so that I can give it a wide berth. - LEM
20 Nov 10
A travesty of a production that seeemed to take place in a disused tram shed and was notable in the audience's applause being loudest for Leporello and muted for Don G. The director seems to have got bored by the time the conclusion arrives and what should be a dramatic descent into hellfor the Don involves a pork pie and baguette picnic andan accidental electrocution. Shame someone didn't put 500 volts up the the cast and set designers backsides - with the exception of Sarah Tynan and Brindley Sherratt, the performers all appeared to be gritting their teeth through the more ridiculous aspects of their on stage antics. 6th forms have done this better. - Jon Briggs
18 Nov 10
Miserable production under all aspects, childish fireworks and crackles and spooky breaths...does this producer get paid for ridiculising operas? - Simon