Michael Coveney says this play no longer has the ability to shock, and, as far as this production goes, I entirely agree. I saw it at a matinee performance with only about a quarter capacity audience, which must be dispiriting for the cast, but even so, the acting was uninvolving and oddly mannered, especially from Lesley Sharp as Mrs Alving. And why was it necessary for Pastor Manders to have an Irish accent, especially one as random as that produced by Iain Glen? The best performance came from the solid Malcolm Storry as Engstrand. Harry Treadaway as Oswald made the transition from spoiled prodigal to gibbering syphilitic too quickly, but this was more the fault of the condensed McGuiness version. This is still a great play which, in a better production, can move the audience to tears. It is a pity that this version is being withdrawn before the end of its appointed run, for I feel it had a lot more to offer, given a chance to establish itself. - sc
17 Mar 10
I have to agree with Michael Coveney I saw this Friday and it was truly awful. A less in how to destroy Ibsen. The cast were not helped by a version "translation" by Frank McGuiness which condensed the action into barely two hours. The lighting was some of the worst I've seen in the West End. This play should be atmospheric. The set also didn't help the players with no sense of Sweden or claustrophobia.As for Iain Glen directing and acting in this production, this was a definite mistake. In ACT One Mrs Alving seemed quite lost at times. A huge disappointment. - Stuart
01 Mar 10
Sort of enjoyed 'Ghosts'. Hard not to like a play where an orphanage burns down and four out of the five characters get syphilis.
----
Compact plot: Mrs Alving uses her husband’s legacy to build an orphanage with help of old flame Pastor Manders at whose candlelight supper to open the place, it burns to the ground. Ghostly skeletons springdans out of the family closet when it’s revealed Captain Alving had spread it about a bit, peppering the fjords with genetically-infected illegitimates in the days before penicillin and the son of the house can’t marry the maid he fancies because she’s his sister. He goes blind and dies.
----
What raises this production so far above the reverential deference typically accorded Ibsen is the design and some excellent performances.
----
The central dynamic is Lesley Sharp straining at her leash about as far from the cobbles of comfortable Granada dramas as possible and in wonderful contrast to her exhilarating recent performance as bipolar leopard-print Mari in Little Voice. Raw-boned and sharp-elbowed she brings the internal torture of Mrs Alving to the surface in a clear and un-actressy way, abetted by the patently conversational fresh translation by Frank McGuinness.
----
Pastor Manders is harder to appreciate since Iain Glen, who also directs, chose an accent precisely midway between Mr Hudson in Upstairs, Downstairs and Ian Paisley. As the tortured painter son, Harry Treadaway is beyond remarkable in his overnight progression from pampered prodigal to twitching degradation caught between lover and mother. Someone sign this boy up for ‘Hamlet’, he’s a natural.
----
Most productions of ‘Ghosts’, like ‘A Doll’s House’ are internalized and underlit. Stephen Brimson Lewis sets this one in a glassy rain-lashed conservatory emphasising the indistinction of the world outside, brilliantly lit by Oliver Fenwick as though by shining light on the family’s problems we can see them, and ourselves, more clearly.
----
My enjoyment of this performance was greatly enriched by the octogenarian blind lady who sat next to me at the matinee. Her father, who was sixty when she was born, was a Swedish professor of literature who came to England as London correspondent of a Svenska Dagbladet and had been a close chum of Strindberg before being unfortunately killed in the blitz. Her insights into Scandinavian culture, and the rivalries between Strindberg and Ibsen were even more illuminating than the play. ----
more reviews at www.johnnyfoxlondon.blogspot.com in the blog now called A KICK IN THE STALLS
- JohnnyFox
26 Feb 10
Some of the lukewarrm reviews seem to believe that Ghosts has lost its' ability to shock but surely a good production will recreate the moral values of the time. The play has also gained unexpected topicality as part of the discussion on assisted suicide. Actually this isn't a great production but I suspect the cast are still finding their way into their character's complex emotions. Lesley Sharp doesn't have the necessary moral indignation and Iain Glen is not as intense as usual - not helped by a bizarre accent which seems to mix Jethro with Ian Paisley. He may have taken on too much with directing resposnsibilities as well but I would lay odds he will be much better by the end of the run. The production is true to the period and doesn't attempt to find any humour which doesn't exist in the original text but above all it is Ibsen's genius which makes Ghosts a great addition to the West End in a theatre of just the right size. - David Baxter
24 Feb 10
I loved it. - Emma
24 Feb 10
Well Ibsen is never fun but enjoyed the play and thought the cast was very good specially Lesley Sharp and Harry Treadaway. I take my hat off to Lesley to have come straight from a very wordy role in Little Voice and into another very wordy emotional role. I recommend it - Joe Spiteri