History, politics, the theatre - it only needed a quick game of football or rugby in the interval and every one of my boxes would have been ticked. Harold Macmillan is now most remembered for the Profumo scandal but Never So Good paints a fascinating portrait of the man across the four major periods which shaped his politics and his life. Howard Brenton is an unlikely hagiographer but it is to his great credit that he has found the humanity in Macmillan who was never able to forget the suffering of the millions who died or were maimed in the First World War and was a one-nation Tory before they were invented. This is a much more sympathetic portrait than Michael Billington managed in his pitifully one-eyed book, State of the Nation. I have never been a fan of Jeremy Irons but he is exceptional as Macmillan, inhabiting the man so completely that all of his usual ticks disappered. Some of the other characterisations are less successful; presumably Robert Hardy was unavailable to play Churchill. Never So Good may be too dry for anyone without an abiding interest in political history of the 20th century, but for those who have it is an absolute triumph. - David Baxter
14 Aug 08
What a tour de-force by Jeremy Irons as Macmillan and the rest of the cast are superb too, especially Robert Glenister as Boothby who I remember so well. Hopefully it will have a run in the westend. - ILS
12 Aug 08
An absolutely stunning tour de force from Jeremy Irons who was fascinating throughout. Sitting in the frightfully uncomfortable ten pound standby seat armless row b I was nevertheless totally engrossed and rarely fidgeted. (Unlike during Philistines) Unusually for me I enjoyed the dance sequences because they added to the understanding of the era and were performed by characters in their own right. Pip Carter, as young Macmillan, shows an great deal of promise - what a learning experience it must be for this young man to watch such mesmerising peformers as Irons and Glenister. I found the play witty and engrossing; maybe because it is now at the end of its run.
- Carrie Cohen
27 Jul 08
A rambling work which would have been so much more effective if it had been shorter and less reliant on its intrusive special effects. The dance sequences were unnecessary, the sets were uninspiring and the device of having the young and the old Macmillan on stage together seemed like a redundant piece of 'clever' stagecraft for its own sake. The play comes to life in the second half with Jeremy Irons at last seeming to get into the skin of the ageing PM. The cast, however, was largely wasted, the exception being Anthony Calf as the dithering Eden. Ian McNeice as Churchill did the best he could with a role which was little more than a caricature, and Robert Glenister as Robert Boothby was suitably odious. Howard Brenton is capable of so much better than this. A disappointment. - sc
24 May 08
Histiry lite, with the Harold Macmillan experience from Madame Tussauds. Abysmal performances from a row of waxworks and flacid dross from a once great writer.Dumb, dumb, dumb. - joesmith
23 May 08
As someone who does not remember the era of MacMillan, this play still rang down the ages to me. The staging with its echoes of the concrete of the Lyttelton theatre, made me think of a play set in a netherworld where the characters can meet their younger selves and interact in the way they do, an inspired design.
Which also leads me to the element I didn't think quite worked, the younger and older MacMillans on stage at the same time, by the end of Act 4 the younger self seemed to have become redundant, and just there because he had been through the rest of the play.
Excellent performances all round, seeing Prime Ministers coming to life on stage is quite an experience making me think of Stuff Happens again. - Greg
09 May 08
Disappointing - cariatures all. Well what else could they be I guess. When actors stroll across the stage dropping names like "Neville" (Chamberlain of course). "Ike" (Eisenhower) and "Winston" (Who else!) Poor ol' Ian McNeice looked preposturous as Churchill doing neither himself or Churchill any favours. It required pyrotechnics to stop the audience falling asleep and it achieved that shortly before the end of the first act. Dull theatre that's not helping much after the NT's recent run of hit and misses. Come on NT you can do better than this! - rds
20 Apr 08
I didn't realise how much I missed those epic plays about Britain like the Hare 'state of the nation' trilogy until last night. What a fascinating, enthralling and deeply satisfying experience this is. I am too young (just!) to remember any of the period covered by the play and I was struck by the parallels between Suez and Iraq, how pivotal the middle east has always been (and always will be?) to world affairs and how nothing really changes in politics; it's a dirty business. It's a superb piece of writing - insightful, often funny and occaasionally poignant - and sweeps along at a great pace (though it takes a short while to take off). Pip Carter and Jeremy Irons, both on stage for the entire play, are excellent as Macmillan old and young and in a terrific ensemble Ian McNeice's Churchill, Anthony Calf's Eden, Robert Glenister's Boothby and Clive Francis' Eisenhower stand out. I loved the dances that move you through time and the second world war scenes made me jump in my seat. This is what the National is for. - Gareth James
28 Mar 08
NB: [The review below should have been signed 'Nigel - another one'] - Nigel
19 Mar 08
I agree with my namesake - this was an enjoyable biographical production, which should be enjoyed at face value for the quality of the performances and the story it tells. If anything, my fellow theatre-goers and I thought it weakest in its attempts to graft on extra complexity and deeper meanings where none are needed. The references to Macmillan's religion, his relationship with his mother, and wartime experiences seem calculated to paint him as a classic tortured soul, but this is never convincing. His complex marriage and nervous breakdown are more credible themes for added depth, but both appear as incidental to the narrative.
Instead of manufacturing inner turmoil, Irons instead conveys a sense of world-weary dejection and bemusement at social change. Some of his sardonic asides almost reminded me of Peter O'Toole as Jeffrey Bernard - especially alongside the semi-comic portrayals of Churchill and Boothby.
Overall, an enjoyable canter through a colourful political life. - another one!)
19 Mar 08
I'm not sure why Fred went to see this play. It is a bio play but its neither dreary nor inert.
The performances from characters remembered by the majorty of the older than usual audience were recognisable.
Unless one has read a biography of MacMillan first, the story is enlightening and the dramatice effect of giving another voice to the "ghost" of his younger self, helps give a voice to Mac's thoughts.
I went prepared to enjoy it (despite Fred's crit) and I did. - Nigel
18 Mar 08
first preview warning..
an example of the worst of the national - a great cast (of thousands) and expensive production lavished on a long, dramatically inert, dreary bio-play. characters talk to each other in facts, or occasional semi-erudite audience-pleasing quips. one or two scenes in the first world war and around suez almost come to life, but the night drags on, and macmillan is harassed endlessly and pointlessly by his former self, the empire fades and so does the audience. there's something very decadent about this over-produced mediocre drama - particularly when the subsidy supporting it could have been used to support maybe fifteen productions of new, urgent, exciting work. - fred