I saw this play in its last week. I enjoyed the staging and thought all the actors did a great job. I found the first half the most interesting with the gradually emerging family secrets/problems. It was frustrating that these were never fully uncovered in the second half and that there was no resolution at the end - I suppose this reflects reality where issues often fester under the surface and cannot be easily resolved.
I didn't hang around afterwards as there already seemed to be a sizeable crowd waiting for Orlando Bloom. I did hear, however, that things got rather out of hand (on the final Saturday night) including bottles being thrown by passing drunks which led to Orlando's autograph signing session being cut short by security staff. Fortunately it appears that no-one was hurt but what a sad ending for any waiting fans who missed their chance to meet Orlando due to the local louts. - Irene
18 Sep 07
Play totally boring, waste of time and money, travelled for 4 hours to see Orlando in this play, I am from Yorkshire and didnt quite understand it ! then we waited to see Orlando after and he only signed a couple of autographs then left, charming !! - Stacey Hodgson
17 Sep 07
Keep the flag of drama flying Sonia but please make it good theatre. This was OK until the interval but the second half was so sloppily written I was left wondering where the bridges between the emotions were. Most of the male performers were shouting at us as well as each other it got really tedious. Also, why did the interval on 12 Sept extend to nearly 40 mins - were the cast watching the football. Made a long evening feel interminable not surprised there were quite a few empty seats. - KMcD
13 Sep 07
Boring beyond words. (Orlando -- suggest you have a discussion with whomever got you involved in this drama.... your talent is completely wasted here...) - Terry Johnson
12 Sep 07
I have nothing but admiration for Sonia Friedman's determination to keep serious drama in the West End and I have no problem with 'star casting' in order to put bums on seats.....but why oh why did she choose this play above so many other better ones of the period. It's difficult to fault the craftsmanship of the staging, design and performances, but its a very long and very dull 2hr 40 min. As a London theatre-goer, I felt like a stranger in a sea of Orlando Bloom fans in the same way I did at Equus - except that this may put them off theatre for life while the former probably converted them overnight ! - Gareth James
04 Sep 07
HOw long must we put up with below average directing from creative teams with no flair, no spark and no originality? What was the point of this? Why did Anna Mackmin passionately feel she needed to do this? Who knows. The passionate pull of careerism must be unbelievable. But then, who cares about product, or artistic integrity, hell, who cares about quality? Go learn something about theatre, then maybe get to call yourself a director. None of the actors can be blamed for this souless and unnecessary production. Theatre is transgression, not a polite museum exhibit. - Simon
23 Aug 07
The first half of In Celebration rather laboriously sets up a wedding anniversary / family reunion which inevitably will descend into family arguments, recriminations and dark secrets. Sure enough the even more plodding second half brings all these but the overwhelming reaction is, "So what". The problems of the three sons are desperately trivial or not even explained properly and they come across as totally ungrateful for the sacrifices that allowed them to leave behind their mining roots for university education and good careers. Horribly miscast (all three sons are played by actors 10 years too young), directed at a funereal pace and poorly lit and designed, it is possible to see the attraction for Orlando Bloom - he gets to do some character acting but in an underwritten and unchallenging role - but it's difficult to see why anyone else wanted to resurrect this old relic. - David Baxter
22 Aug 07
All the cast did a brilliant job. They made me laugh at the right time and moved me at the right time. Thank you to all for providing a wonderful few hours of theatre - Nadine
30 Jul 07
All the cast were excellent. I was particularly impressed by Mr Bloom, perhaps because I was expecting not to be, his character was often silent and falling apart but he conveyed this superbly. I really enjoyed it. - Liz
29 Jul 07
Psst, he can't act for toffee, nor Lembas bread, nor pieces of eight, and the others although competent, all overact to compensate, so the balance of this beautiful, sensitive play is lost. Add to the mix some uncommonly clumsy direction, a wonky set that doesn't make sense from any angle and noisy stage management. Then there is the audience of silly little girls, swooning at the feet of aggressive security staff. What next Ms. Friedman? Perhaps Paris Hilton could be persuaded to give us her Mother Courage. - Joesmith
27 Jul 07
The play does not stand the test of time. It might have had some relevance back in the early 70's, but now it is alienating.
The characters speak lines that sound fake and unnatural. The fathers monologue in the first half is a case in point. But the real fault with the play is that it tells the audience "something is rotten here" ad-nauseum...but it never does us the courtesy to explain what it is.
I saw it with a friend, we both left completely puzzled and agreed we could not recommend to others. - Steve
26 Jul 07
Great afternoon of theatre, fantastic cast, funny and moving. Don't miss it! - Tracy
23 Jul 07
Excellent play. All the cast were really good. - Kathy Muirhead