Jeff Clarke on Opera della LunaDate: 4 October 2011What can Opera della Luna's approach bring to operetta classics such as Ruddigore? Does this approach bring in a new audience? If so, why? I guess there are many reasons, but basically we rid the shows of old traditional bits of business that have become tired, we look at the shows as though they were new writing and we bring a very energetic and inventive style to our productions. We find in venues that we visit regularly that we have built a regular following as well as bringing in a new audiences. Are some of the Gilbert and Sullivan pieces more relevant to the 21st century than others? If so, which, and why? Equally, I don’t think that it’s a problem if a piece is set in its period. Our HMS Pinafore is definitely Victorian – but its just as much fun as the others. What Gilbert was usually satirising is the British psyche and our attitudes to class, authority, and institutions – and those foibles haven’t changed. Is this true for other composers such as Offenbach, Johann Strauss and [Lehár]? My firm principle is that the theatre is not a museum and any piece needs to have something to say to the audience that is going to see it. A historical re-production of something created for a different age is not of any interest to me. Opera della Luna also produces music-related plays such as Nightmare Songs. How important is this sort of cross-over? What new productions and revivals are in the pipeline? Related Content
Back to Southeast Homepage |
Buy Tickets
Free Newsletter
Featured Video Featured Editor's Picks
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








































