This is nowhere near as bad as many of the reviews make it out to be. In fact I thought the first half was extremely strong, despite a couple of interruptions due to rain on the night. It flags a bit after the interval, losing its way slightly, but still provides a decent night out. While the songs aren't especially memorable, they're more than serviceable. The set looks great. The cast do their best. And the story is strong. I'd mark it 7/10. And, contrary to many reports here, I didn't notice any real walkouts during the interval -- the vast majority of people in attendance on the night I saw it stayed to the end and seemed to enjoy it. - Darren O'Shaughnessy
27 Aug 12
Ever since I bought the CD of Ragtime several years ago I've wanted to see a production of this sprawlingly epic musical but runs in London and New York had runs cut short before we had the chance to go. It's a show that clearly divides opinions and initially I was a bit concerned that Timothy Sheader had chosen to set it in the present day but the conceit of a disparate group coming together to assume the roles gradually makes sense as the show develops. It means that Jon Bausor's waste tip stage design can be imagined as a wide variety of settings and it allows the cast to play multiple characters. I can even forgive a couple of otherwise crass casting decisions. Not all the performances are as good as we have come to expect at the park but there can be no reservations about Rolan Bell's charismatic Coalhouse Walker or Rosalie Craig as the mother around whom all the events revolve. Ragtime is a hugely ambitious attempt to turn E.L. Doctorow's epic novel into a musical and can be guilty of attempting to cram too much in to the running time. But at its best it is a very good show indeed and Sheader's version does enable it to point up relevance to 2012, exactly 100 years after its setting. However a lot of concessions have been made due to the park's unique requirements and I would still oove to see a more traditional 'indoor' production. - David Baxter
02 Aug 12
I have no connection to the Open Air Theatre so this is an entirely personal review. I had reservations about going to see Ragtime due to the negative reviews but I am so glad I did. I absolutely loved it and still felt emotional the next day while thinking about it, as did other friends. I had been to see Sweeney Todd only a couple of weeks before and despite great performances from Michael Ball and Imelda Staunton I have no urge to see it again. I am, however, returning to Ragtime with my other half in September. Well done all!! - Sue
02 Aug 12
simply cant believe you can walk out at the interval,if you profess to be a musical lover.ok it's not the best show I have seen,however I thought the cast were amazing and certainly were worth the entrance fee alone.all the components of good theatre was there, so even if you did not like the production itself, you should have watched the whole show and admired the talent. - phil
29 Jul 12
What a miserable bunch of so-and-so`s! I love this musical. O.K., this production wasn,t perfect, certainly not as good as the Maria Friedman version of a frw years ago, but I really enjoyed it. The cast were uniformly good (some exceptional)and the sound was very good. There was a pretty good house when I saw it and no signs of any "massed walkouts!". In fact the audience reaction at the end was very enthusiastic.Would happily see it again if any misery-guts has a ticket that they don`t want!! - John M
17 Jul 12
I see the OAT has now been forced to sell tickets off at half price-I don't recall them ever having to do this in the past. No doubt they will blame the weather for poor attendances but they need to take an honest look at why Ragtime has failed. You would have to pay me to sit through it again! - DCH
12 Jul 12
This is the worse show I have seen at Regent's Park in thirty years of attending this venue.Can't imagine what it must be doing to the reputation of this lovely theatre. So so sad. - anna
08 Jul 12
What an absolutely dreadful show! The creative team should be embarrassed! - JOlyphant
02 Jul 12
I never thought I would walk out of a musical, I've sat through some rubbish in my time, but this was the living end. A terrible production, the only one saving grace was the gusto with which the talented cast gave the terribly choices given to them by the creative team. Mass walk outs from all areas of the auditorium. It was embarrassing. - Hannah
26 Jun 12
Dreadful. Nine of us walked out at the interval, and it was only 1/3rd full at the start. Close it now and regain your dignity. - Pete
19 Jun 12
An abomination, from beginning to end. NOT clever. NOT interesting. NOT even remotely coherent. I cannot express how terrible this show really is! - Roy
14 Jun 12
More American NIGHTMARE than Dream. - Joe Harlan
06 Jun 12
I love the show and the score of 'Ragtime' and did enjoy the evening due to the performances, I do feel that the production was overloaded and should be allowed to stand on its own merit rather than trying to add more layers.The initial impression was that the show would be set on a building site but this improved as the lights fell and a theatrical feel took
over.Can't see why a black man played the racist white grandfather or a woman Booker T Washington.'Mother' was brilliant and her rendition of 'Back to Before' is worth the ticket price alone. - steve
03 Jun 12
Having seen this show recently I agree that some of these stunning reviews must have been posted by staff or friends of Open Air Theatre staff.I definately didn't see the same show as Sam who gave it 5 stars.And what about the earlier review who gave this production 3 stars without even seeing it.
Hope to return to the Open Air Theatre next year to see another stunner like Hello!,Dolly, Into the Woods or Crazy for You.This year, don't waste that hard earned money on a ticket to see this flop. - Rachel
01 Jun 12
Spot on George - GRIFF
01 Jun 12
The repetition of the phrase "Simply Stunning!" is some of these strangely extatic reviews makes me think that these are either the desperate park's doing to try and salvage the public opinion. Either that, or the cast. Reminds me of when the Southbank Centre did the same with their poorly recieved production of "The Wizard of Oz". - George
01 Jun 12
I thought this was a very thought provoking production and I really enjoyed it. The music is simply stunning and very memorable. The whole cast is superb especially Rosalie Craig as Mother, Tamsin Carroll as Emma Goldman and John Marquez as Tateh. It takes a while getting used to the modern concept but ultimately I think it works and the majority of the piece is performed in period costume which creates an interesting juxtaposition. It is an epic musical and I would definitely go back again. - Sam
31 May 12
Why is a piece entirely about HOPE and DREAMS of the American people which actually sends out a message of hope and longing for justice set on a scrap heap? This conveys the idea that their dreams are all broken and that there is no 'American Dream' after all. This is constantly at odds with the material itself, and their a mis-interpretation or misreading. I also found the concept confusing on all levels. - Julia
31 May 12
I hated this horrendous staging of such a brilliant musical. The concept was appalling, the design ugly and the entire thing dire. I found it difficult to sit through and just wanted the entire thing to be over as soon as possible. If you paid top price like I did you'd feel extremely cheated and disappointed. Do yourself a favor, don't go to Ragtime at the Open Air - spend your money on a great musical like "Singin' in The Rain" or "Sweeney Todd". Bunch of self-important middle class toffs failing miserably in their attempt for be new, cutting edge and innovative - in the end none of these things are achieved. My wife even commented "It's not even so bad you could laugh at it - it's much worse". - Robert
31 May 12
awful. - Cassox
30 May 12
The OAT attempts to stage a production full of ideas and thoughtful staging but is doomed by the choice of such an incredibly dire musical.Why, oh why waste all this talent on such a non-starter.I just despair at this choice of show for a long summer run in Olympic year. - Rob
30 May 12
- Nick
30 May 12
The music is stunning, even though I agree that it would have been much better to SEE the band than having them hidden, and add those extra seats on the side of the stage. The cast was strong but Mother really stood out.
The set on the other hand was poorly designed, and I don't say that only from the point of view of the concept. To start with, I was in the front row and I had so much dust coming over me during the show I probably looked like a ghost at the end. That was unpleasant (and unhealthy). They could have made an apocalyptic set without just dumping loose construction material around the stage. Now concept-wise, even though I'm all for experimental theatre, it didn't feel true to this piece to use this production design. Especially for me that have known the music for years but never had a chance to see the original production, this was a disappointment. The idea of throwing those obvious contemporary 'American Dream' images on the set, like Obama's face, felt jarring and completely anachronistic, as well as the contemporary outfits that would remain on half of the cast until almost the end of act 1. I would have understood completely if these devices had been used before the prologue, but having half of the characters in period costumes and half in contemporary urban outfits felt way too sloppy. I imagine they used this device and the integrated casting to desperately say that this production is against racism or sexism, and this is just a play within a play, but isn't that a little desperate? Just because the show depicts these things it doesn't mean it SUPPORTS them! It's showing bad things so that the audience reaches that same understanding. It was unnecessary to be so scared to show it that way. - Carlos
30 May 12
Unlike other reviewers, I didn't have a problem with the directorial concept, nor the full-blooded gusto that the cast invest it with. I saw a sunny matinee where no lighting effects were ever going to help, and it did seem a case of the wrong show for this venue. Even so, I much preferred this to the original West End version which was gloomy and laden with portent; that said, nothing can disguise a two-dimensional musical with lofty pretensions and no real characterisation. Rolan Bell was terrific as Coalhouse and the whole show lifts when he's on stage. - dgr1
30 May 12
Simply stunning. The performances gave me tingles, and I left feeling like I had witnessed a masterpiece of musical theatre, humming the songs all the way to the tube. The performance of "Mother" was incredible, I haven't heard a voice so beautiful in a long time.
Would definitely see again! - Scott.
30 May 12
The OAT has made a serious error of judgment in putting on this production in a season , lasting 4 months,during which they have reduced the number of plays from their usual 3 to 2. Given that the other production is the Dream which may attract tourists but will not entice locals, then Ragtime simply has to deliver otherwise the season, even with decent weather, will be a disaster.
This is the wrong play for the wrong theatre. The set is profoundly depressing (and potentially a health hazard given the amount of concrete dust I inhaled during the performance!)-and yes I know that this was intended, it just doesn't feel right in the magical ambience which the theatre creates before you enter the auditorium.
Finally, the music is Sondheim without the soaring bits.
We have been going to the OAT for over 20 years-we have seen some wonderful productions over that time (including some darker pieces)but this is easily the worst thing we have ever seen. - DCH
30 May 12
God awful casting apart from mother, Emma and tateh, odd staging and ridiculous concept ideas. Why do directors seem intent on 'doing something different'? Just tell the story!! - Tom
30 May 12
Really an abomination - a female Booker T Washington and a black grandfather of the white family? But this piece is ABOUT the reality of racism and sexism - how can that come through this sort of integrated casting - ill thought through and utterly barmy - the ugly set and modern clothing are also bonkers - such a shame to destroy a truly great novel with this kind of banal nonsense - a real disappointment - Ultra Violet
30 May 12
Many years ago I was working in New York and had 2 spare evenings. First night I went to see Lion King. Hated it. Next night I went to see Ragtime and came out thinking I had seen one of those memorable musicals that I would never forget. The score is TOTALLY stunning and memorable. I took my partner to NYC 6 months later just to see Ragtime. Ok havnt seen this production yet but the music doesnt change and am so looking forward to seeing it. i just dont understand all these comments about no story line - unless its been changed it tells a wonderfull tale of coloured peoples difficulties at that time. - Tony Kimpton
29 May 12
The actors struggled vainly against a truly awful concept but they didn't stand a chance. A wasted opportunity. - Jimbo
29 May 12
After seeing the Landor's and Open Air the production are incomparable! Both have merit of their own! The production at OP has ambition and creativity that we should promote! Strong production that is extremely ambitious! I'm glad it's sparked the debate its just a shame many can't articulate past "Horrible, awful & I didnt like it" - Pete
29 May 12
If people left at the interval it probably was in sheer disappointment mixed with sheer disbelief at the ugliness of this production. Staying for the full show is not compulsory but after you've forked out at least £40 well enough said... - Owen
29 May 12
Same old dull affair. Non-taxing and bland,which was ideal for the middle class, non-thinking audience. Musically, it was a shambles having a score that is unnecessarily difficult and completely unmemorable. This is does seem to be a trend amongst new composers of musical theatre who are not so hot at writing decent tunes. Consequently some of the singing was shakey, probably due to not being able to clearly hear the musical cues by the orchestra. It could have been a striking and thought-provoking night out, instead there wasn't much to talk about at all and no-one to really care about in the story. Shame. - Marc
29 May 12
sorry but just dont agree thought the framing worked really well and company were strong throughout. if you left at the interval why bother going in the first place? - Phil
29 May 12
Just like the original London production. A stinker! - joesmith
29 May 12
Yes, the production at the Landor last year was superior in everyway, though their Coalhouse, Kurt Kansley, is in this production, understudying the role here but otherwise relegated to a member of the ensemble. What a waste. A case of a director and designer imposing their 'vision' and completely neglecting the heart of the piece. It's still a magnificent score but the production sadly alienates the audience from the off. - Boris
29 May 12
I completely disagree, Although some of the ideas were two forced I liked that the production has ambition, drive and passion. The Score in my opinion is stunning and Sheader's Production brings it to the immediate.
Some excellent performances, with a striking and bold design id say its about time were visited Music theatre, and not be afraid to re imagine them.
- Sunday in the park with
29 May 12
An arrogant production of a wonderful musical. People were applauding the musical and the score rather than this heavy handed vision - Paul
29 May 12
couldnt wait to get out with no intention of returning for second act . - GRIFF
29 May 12
Sadly what appears to be under attack in this production at The Open Air is the score - which is unjutified as the production itself is the problem and a huge disappointment, which on the night I attended started the second act with a noticeable number of empty seats. - Owen
29 May 12
Didn't enjoy this production at all. Horrible version, much prefered the Landor's production. Appalling mess at this year's open air theatre. - George