Well, The Priory has certainly polarised opinion here and exposed some awful snobs too. It could have been written by Alan Ayckbourn. In fact if it had Ayckbourn's name on it I bet there wouldn't be a single one star here. I LOVED IT - it was a blast. Rebecca Hynes, seemingly reprising her role as the downtrodden sister in The Norman Conquests, added much poignancy to the character of Kate. Of course some of the other performances were OTT, BUT it was farce - Christ it even had four entrances and exits! And like true farce it has a basic truth, in this case "Is there more to life than success?". Well you'll have to answer that one for yourselves, but Daniel and Kate may just have the answer to that. Don't be put off by the one stars here. Go with an open mind, an open heart and ENJOY yourselves - after all that's what theatre can be and should be sometimes. - rds
04 Jan 10
At first, it seems a contemporary spin on the age-old farce; well executed but rather old-fashioned just the same. Even the realistic set looked like it was recently used for a Ben Travers revival. I was beginning to check I was sitting in those leather Royal Court seats and not in West End ersatz velvet. But just like Sondheim’s musical Into the Woods, where things unravel in the second half, so it goes here. Everyone’s back story comes out and seemingly successful thirty-somethings turn out to be entirely dysfunctional. Some of the acting is hammy and OTT and it’s an odd and not entirely comfortable concoction, but there are enough moments to enjoy to make the trip worthwhile. - Gareth James
08 Dec 09
Bland sit-com rubbish. NOT what the Court should be doing at all. It's simply pandering to the morons who would be happier at the Lion King. This is not "something a bit different" but EXACTLY the same as everywhere else. Dumbing down with a capital 'D'. - The voice of reason
04 Dec 09
Believable characters, perfect pace, was gripped til the end. A great play - something a bit different. - louise
03 Dec 09
We enjoyed this so much and we are writers who were reviewing this play!
Truly funny, dramatic and well written/acted. - Angel
01 Dec 09
Very Poor - Coral
30 Nov 09
One thing you could not call this is 'Very Poor', perhaps it was a little to close to reality for some. Perfect venue to put this on - Sloane Square, first play I have seen where you can actually see the characters sitting in the audience. What is success? How is it measured? Does it bring you happiness? Does it matter?Just a few questions the play provokes, if you want a good laugh with a bitter edge and see quality acting go for it. - Gman.
29 Nov 09
Starts off like an Agatha Christie mystery and then laughs come flying. Expertly written and acted. - Kenneth Stein
28 Nov 09
A very poor play which had some very interesting things to say but so badly written and apart from Rachel Stirling and Ms Riley not very well acted - I loved Jessica on her own shows on TV but her stage acting although poignant needed a lot more work from the Director. All in all a poor night out - and when will the RC employ better bar staff and clean the loos properly! The Court of the 70's was an infinitely nicer and more exciting place to be. - Ruth
28 Nov 09
2 stars for the acting and a few good one-liners. otherwise this is a dreary mess of cheap laughs, easy stereotypes, and common-or-garden thirtysomething angst... - fred
28 Nov 09
excellent direction - alan
27 Nov 09
Utter stinker. Ayckbourn lite with a deeply uncomfortable cast left floundering in the inept text and clunky production. How on earth did this slip through the net? - Joesmith