Katie Mitchell mangles another play. Someone should really get together a petition to have Ms Mitchell go and work overseas and stop inflicting on us this sort of mannered and inhuman staging. Also, can the NT start putting warning labels in bright red on the booking brochures 'Over-directed by KM' so I stop wasting my money buying tickets to her shows. - addicted to theatre
20 Jan 10
couldn't decide if it was a bad play, or one that just did not stand the test of time; or, the over acting or the irritating staging, but this was really tedious and I didn't care about any of the chracters. Didn't manage to wait til the interval to leave ... - J Eve
19 Dec 09
Another stunning tour de force. It's as if the kids from 'Spring Awakening' have grown up, a little, and are even MORE neurotic. Sensational performances and detailed direction. Beautiful, serious theatre. Loved it. - Coral
27 Nov 09
Well was I surprised by this production, no not really is the short answer. The long answer is Katie Mitchell has finally and completely transmuted into Count Frankenstein's alter ego - she sucks the life out of anything and everything she gets her hands on. How she can make theatre so dull is completely beyond me. I honestly went to Pains of Youth tonight with an open mind - trust me I really did, but after one hour I could bear it no longer and had to leave - life's too short. The woman is mad? Or rather the artistic director is mad for allowing this preposterous woman to continue fucking up at our expense. I see a huge amount of theatre each year, 160 plus productions in the UK, NYC and Canada and it is beyond belief that our NT allows the theatrical equivalent of Tracy Emin to squander not only the undoubted talent on the stage, but also the finite resources the NT have available to them. How does she stay on? Can she dish the dirt on Nick Hytner? Answer on a postcard please. Perhaps, if the NT had a really small studio space, one could just possibly allow her to play around there - something like a 50 seater perhaps. It's on nights like this that I come away from our beloved NT and am furious that this precious institution is being allowed to fall into disrespect and ridicule because the person in charge has lost the plot. I've called for Nick Hytner to go before and I think it is time to do so again. Even with all his successes eg: The History Boys and now The Habit of Art under his belt it is still right he should move on and take the baggage with him. NT also stands for National Treasure and we need a breath of fresh air to blow through our NT. What, I wonder, are the governors, employed to look after the institution, doing about it? - rds
25 Nov 09
Katie Mitchell has finally descended into self-parody, her latest gimmicky nonsense causing disbelief in parts of the audience and barely stifled giggles from others. Her refusal to respect the text of any play she mangles also makes it almost impossible for her to produce strong performances from the actors. A talented cast do their best but they are clearly lacking any coherent direction and too often are reduced to shouting at each other. I bet they have no idea why they are also required to march on in modern dress to wrap and unwrap the set in plastic (really!!). It's such a shame because Bruckner's play is a fascinating study of the loves and self-destructive tendencies of 1920s medical students and includes a character of undiluted evil who I suspect strongly influenced Neil LaBute. In more sympathetic hands Pains of Youth could have been compelling. - David Baxter
24 Nov 09
I can't make up my mind if it was the play, the lack of any sypathetic characters, the acting, production with its tiresome scene changes or the lack of light that made this hard to enjoy, that said I did stay till the end and I'm glad that I did. So not as bad as some have said but not a 5 star show either unless I missed something. - CAA
12 Nov 09
A deeply tiresome play by Ferdinand Bruckner (1926) about self-obsessed Viennese medical students, filled with boredom, ennui, accidie etc. Big exodus at interval – a sensible choice though I stuck it out. Doctor in the House it was not. - Martin Elengorn
10 Nov 09
Very disappointing and completely unengaging. The actors shouted at each other for no discernable reason. The gloom of the lighting added nothing to the atmosphere but added to the lack of interest. Only Leo Bill (Petrell) and the music deserve praise. - Vineland
10 Nov 09
did EVERYONE leave at the interval? i know i did. - frankrich
29 Oct 09
Absolute rubbish. Pointless and very boring production played by a cast who looked as though they shared my opinion! - Mark H
29 Oct 09
Unbearably boring, nervously played and self conscious. The most exciting sequence was mopping the floor at the top of act 1. - Di
29 Oct 09
Awfull. Something about medical students, somthing about someone sorta going out with someone else they shouldn't be, something about lesbians... unfortunatly that makes it sound interesting. This is a terribly turged and painful watch. A friend of mine pointed out that Mitchell is a genius theatre scientist, and her actors seem to get far more out of a process then the audience, but then she doesn't much care much for the audience, and in which case, what is the point of showing an audience her work. Although true(ish) i disagree a bit becuse 'After Dido' and 'wome of troy' were seminal moments for me, but pains of Youth may have fallen pray to this, or that she's got a better job in Europe that she cares more about than a rather small little play with some rather unskilled actors.
Above all of this, the plays pointless, why is it important taht public money is spent on this?
I love Katie, but not today..... - Cassox