When I originally saw Jerusalem at the Royal Court I was not quite caught up in the 5-star hysteria, apart from marvelling at Mark Rylance's extraordinary performance. Possibly I had heard too much about what it is really like to have something like Dale Farm on your doorstep to find Jez Butterworth's tale of drinking, drugs and criminality romantic or heroic. However, given the astonishing success of the play in the West End, New York and now back for a final fling at the Apollo it seemed sensible to re-evaluate what many people regard as the greatest play of the century so far. On a second viewing it is possibly not as funny as on first acquaintance but I was struck by a sense of sadness hanging over the sad and wasted lives of almost every character. A substantial proportion of the cast are still in place after more than two years, but there is a substantial improvement in the current Pea, although the actors playing Lee and especially Wesley are not a patch on the originals. Rylance is still a force of nature but this is a more subdued Rooster Byron, aware of his declining faculties and his lack of a place in a changing world. Jerusalem is undoubtedly a remarkable play, even if only for the success it has achieved, but mainly because of the larger than life character of Rooster Byron which Butterworth and Rylance have created. - David Baxter
12 Jan 12
Who wouldn't side with Johnny 'Rooster' Byron and his indomitable spirit. A true hero in the old mold - unbreakable.
And has anyone considered that his stories are real...? Or have we become a nation of rationalists? - Martin
31 Dec 11
Yes, strong lead actor and some good laughs and various themes hit on but it drags on, the dialogues are neither deep, nor punchy, nor hilarious most of the time. Felt like leaving at the first break and regretted not acting on the impulse thinking it would somehow get more interesting and live up to the hype. - Steve
15 Dec 11
One of the worst 10 plays I have ever seen - a 3 hour endurance test. A bunch of characters I couldn't care less about, spouting weak jokes propped up by tiresome foul language. - oldhasbeen
06 Nov 11
Saw this on Saturday. Thouhgt I wouldn't be able to see it because of the popularity and price but went online Friday night and saw that the upper circle restricted view ticket(s) were over £47, I think. Queued £10 for a Box A, instead. Never done day seats before nor saw Rylance live, I think. He was making eye contact it felt like al the way, through. One of the best things I've ever seen on stage. Matched All My Sons and Blood Brothers, I think. Bravo! - theatrefan
17 Oct 11
This play was refreshing and amazing, the acting was brilliant, and it had me on the edge of my seat the whole time (literally because of the nose-bleed section seats!). Really worth seeing if you don't mind foul language. I would rate it 5 stars, only I took 1 off because the play is very long, and I felt the 3rd leg dragged on a little too long. Go see it !! - Guest
09 Apr 10
Emotionally exhaustive, brilliant play. 1000 thanks to my lovely lady friend for getting tix and talking me into seeing the play while on vacation in London. Go see this before it's too late. - J. Martinez
09 Apr 10
A lovely opening song ruined by the rest of the play. Abysmal script with excessive amounts of swearing and innuendoes it was a truly awful night out. Great performance from Rylance and most of the others but it was a shame they were depicting such horrible characters. Do youreslves a favour and save your money, i 100% DON'T recommend this play. - MH
13 Mar 10
Truly 5 star. Rylance deserves all the plaudits. Fabulous writing too. SEE THIS PLAY! - Peter G
04 Mar 10
When I reviewed this play during the Royal Court run six months ago, I said it was great though not a classic – well, I’m wrong; it is! It has so much depth that it needs a second view. It's a theatrical feast with an epic sweep and it’s very funny, but somehow the contradictions come through more. Your sympathies are with rebel Rooster Byron but you know you’d hate it if he was your neighbour. You laugh at the ‘war stories’ of drug-fuelled parties the morning after, but you can’t approve of his drug dealing. Your heart is with his in an England of old but your brain knows things have to change. Even his young followers both celebrate and exploit him. There are many themes being explored here – changes in rural life, tolerance of different lifestyles, urban invasion - and you’re thinking about them a long time after you’ve left the theatre - but it’s the pace, rhythm and energy that sweeps you away and sustains a running time of over 3 hours without flagging for a moment. There is more poignancy second time round and his loneliness really gets under your skin. It’s a real state-of-the-(rural)-nation play with lots to say about lots of things, but without rights and wrongs, taking sides or preaching. At times last night, I felt I was in the woods with this lord of misrule and his pilgrims. There are a lot of young inexperienced actors in this superb ensemble who will no doubt never forget the experience of a nightly masterclass in acting from Mark Rylance, who positively inhabits this wonderfully meaty role of Shakespearean proportions. You don’t see many performances like this in a lifetime. There’s an Airstream caravan in the woods with a soundscape that helps take you there. It doesn’t look like it was directed, which is a great compliment to Ian Rickson’s direction! It IS a classic and it will be revived in the future, but go and see it now because it’s a play for now with a production and performances which are probably already definitive. - Gareth James
11 Feb 10
Magnificent - JH
10 Feb 10
I saw this last night and wasn't particularly impressed. I think Mark Rylance is one of the greatest actors of our generation. His performance in Jerusalem is nothing short of outstanding. The ensemble around him are also all on top form. I just didn't really warm to the play at all. I prefer something with a story rather than a random day in the life of a group of people. The play just didn't seem to go anywhere or have any particular message. I didn't really identify with any of the characters, so I thought the whole thing lacked any kind of emotion. It also need someone with a big pair of scissors to trim it all down. I think there may have been a better play in there if it had been nearer 2 hours than 3. - Steve
02 Feb 10
The acting is very good indeed. The ensemble feel was re-inforced by Mark Rylance not taking an individual bow - a very generous act as he would probably have got a standing ovation. Whilst the play is well written it dragged for me in two parts and the emphasis on all the drug use with the casual understanding that this is something everyone does when it isn't was a bit far fetched. The Amoral quality was disturbing at times and rather niave especially about the consequences but Mark Rylance was completely convincing as was Mackenzie Crook. Stunning acting all round. - hilary
20 Aug 09
Absolutely extraordinary!
The most significant play I have seen for a very long time in a superlative production. Deserves a transfer. - JJE
15 Aug 09
It's easy to see why Jerusalem has garnered so many rave reviews: Jez Butterworth's script crackles with ribald humour, the acting is superb (with the exception of poor Jessica Barden who was barely audible from the fifth row) and at the centre is a larger than life tour de force from Mark Rylance which is virtually guaranteed to haul in the awards at the end of the year. And yet it didn't completely work for me. Over thre hours long, the final act really dragged and is the permanently stoned and boozed up rural underclass really part of the green and plesant land the Royal Court intelligentsia like to pretend is still out there? Amongst a star-studded audience (Tom Stoppard, Toby Stephens and others) were most of the cast on a works outing from The Winter's Tale. That excellent production shows that three hours can pass quickly, by the end Jerusalem was staggering to a long overdue conclusion. - David Baxter
14 Aug 09
I'm not sure it's a great play, but it is a theatrical feast. There are many themes being explored in an intelligent and funny way and you're thinking about them for a long time after you've left the theatre, but it's the pace, rhythm and energy that sweeps you away. There are a lot of young inexperienced actors in this excellent ensemble who will no doubt never forget the experience of a nightly masterclass in acting from Mark Rylance, who positively inhabits this wonderfully meaty role of Shakespearean proportions. You don't see many performances like this in a lifetime yet he takes his bows in the least starry way alongside his colleagues. Wonderful. - Gareth James
11 Aug 09
I would have given 5 stars if the writer had allowed his characters, sixteen in all, to develop beyond their respective, and limited, functions within the larger thematic concerns of the play. Having said that though, I loved Mark Rylance's Rooster Byron - he gives yet another masterclass in acting and so soon after his triumph in Boeing Boeing. It's a long sit, helped by having two intervals, but worth it all the same. - rds
29 Jul 09
Ella dear you're illiterate - a pal
27 Jul 09
very enjoyable and a "tour de force" acting by mark Rylance. Book your tickets NOW! - ella
26 Jul 09
Very good but Rylance needs to concentrate on a Tuesday night more. We pay the same price as those on a Saturday.....and the comic can't act. - coral
22 Jul 09
I was completely blown away like nothing I have ever seen before.Beautiful, tragic and yet fantastically funny.Go you wont be disappointed I've already booked more tickets! - Andrea
21 Jul 09
A brilliant production of a very important play. This deserves a West End transfer. - pwh1980
16 Jul 09
Brilliant script - funny, moving, poetic - and a wonderful production. Go. - fred