It's not sub-anyone else, it's Jez Butterworth! Like his other plays, I found it sparklingly original but he doesn't lay it all out for you - you have to put in some work too and decide what YOU think. I found myself moving from laughter to anger to contempt to sadness, but I was always captivated. The only problem with Jez Butterworth is that he doesn't write enough plays - this is the 4th in 15 years. Still, like the proverbial bus, we have another before the summer's over. - Gareth James
28 Apr 09
Perhaps I'm more stupid than I thought but I really came away not knowing what the author was driving at. The, nearly always, starchy Almeida audience began to let their hair down a bit tonight and seemed to enjoy Toby Jones' hugely funny work-out routine, but what did it really have to do with the play? His equally hilarious miming, to an audio sex manual, again showed us what a gift for comedy Mr Jones possess. Sometimes authors can climb so far up their own backsides that it would need surgery to remove them. If Mr Butterworth finds the time, perhaps he would be kind enough to publish an explanation as to what this play was all about. Fred writes of the play as being "a sub-Pinter collection of pointless ideas" - not a bad summary Fred, but I would also venture perhaps sub-Orton too. Perhaps, on top of all the other criticisms one can level at the author the worst one would be of plagiarism? 2/10 See Me. - rds
20 Apr 09
All the performances are good and Toby Jones shows what a natural comic he is in two hilarious scenes - one wordless and the other responding to a sex manual. But the play is a sub-Pinter collection of pointless ideas. A dreadful piece. - fred
11 Apr 09
This is really brilliant, as good as Mojo but nothing like it. The performances are a riot, especially Toby Jones who was wasted in "Every Good boy..." and has them rolling in the aisles. Very funny, don't miss it. - joesmith