I thought this was a very good and thoughtful production. Michael Gould was fantastic as Iago. However, he had the stand-out performance, rather than Patrice Naiambana, who only seemed to shine in his scenes with Natalia Tena. Overall though, I thought it was very well put together, especially the music. - Monica Holland
20 Feb 09
Enjoyed this an awful lot more than expected. Extremely well characterised and beautifully staged. Standout for me was Cassio, warm and interesting portrayal. Recommended. - Nic
19 Feb 09
The girl playing Desdemona is not very good. There is a broken bottle prop with more stage presence than Othello. And by the way, it's "bated breath" - Hugo van den Berg
19 Feb 09
I went to see this production with my wife and son on 12/2, when two key roles - Iago and Cassio - were played by understudies. My congratulations to them - I thought that they did as well as could be expected and perhaps a bit better. Also, congratulations to Tamzin Griffin, who (in the second half particularly) grabbed the opportunities offered by the role of Emelia with both hands. Natalia Tena as Desdemona was touching in her innocence, especially in the second half of the play, and there are good directorial touches in the production - I liked the use of moveable bridges to represent Venice, ships, etc. and the multifaceted shields were another good, imaginative, touch. But there, I'm afraid, my positive comments run out. This play has an underlying feeling of menace running through it, but here, it rolls merrily along, and often seems to be played for laughs (not the murder scene, thank goodness!). It was no surprise that some of the younger members of the audience found some of the play's more intense moments funny (and no, I'm not missing the point about the importance to Shakespeare of tragedy being intermingled with comedy). The tittering from the circle must have been off-putting to the actors, and it is to their credit that they managed to overcome it and, in most instances, silence the laughter. But a production of Othello shouldn't offer audiences the opportunity to find Othello's antics funny. Others have commented on the difficulty they experienced hearing the text. Good - I'm glad it wasn't just me! Shakespeare's poetry, especially when spoken by Othello, was often lost in a blaze of emotion. The rhythm of the language is one of the reasons why Shakespeare has remained popular throughout the ages: it would have been hard to guess that from much of this production. I could go on, but I won't. I have great admiration for the RSC but overall, this production really doesn't come up to their usual high standards. - Brian Hopson
13 Feb 09
I have always held the RSC close to my heart as a venerable company. Tonight I felt embarrased to have done so. As the previous comments suggest, Iago's understudy can be expected of the odd trip up, but for Othello to miss cues and lines is near unforgiveable.
I felt as though the production was still in rehearsal stage. Small touches such as waving flags and Desdemona's expanding bed were potentially brilliant efforts. But there was so little polish to the performance, I was constantly reminded that that was what I was watching.
I came with high expectations, yes, but then I didn't think the RSC would let me down. - Sylvie Havad
12 Feb 09
A rather poor production of a great play. Michael Gould's undersudy not only fumbled his lines (forgiveable) but did not manage to portray any of Iago's complicated evil character. Othello also missed lines and his diction, and cadence, did nothing for Shakespeare or the audience. He played Othello like an animal, not like a proud, successful general consumed by passion. Cassio seemed a public school boy out of his depth. The only outstanding bit of acting came from the Duke in his wheelchair. The audience was full of young people, one of whom we heard remark,"This was the silliest thing I've ever seen." The only redeeming features were the set and the music. Certainly a shockingly poor production for the RSC to offer its public. - ursula higham
12 Feb 09
A rather poor production of a great play. Michael Gould's undersudy not only fumbled his lines (forgiveable) but did not manage to portray any of Iago's complicated evil character. Othello also missed lines and his diction, and cadence, did nothing for Shakespeare or the audience. He played Othello like an animal, not like a proud, successful general consumed by passion. Cassio seemed a public school boy out of his depth. The only outstanding bit of acting came from the Duke in his wheelchair. The audience was full of young people, one of whom we heard remark,"This was the silliest thing I've ever seen." The only redeeming features were the set and the music. Certainly a shockingly poor production for the RSC to offer its public. - ursula higham
12 Feb 09
Oh dear. My wife and I went last night, and the announcement was made that Michael Gould was unwell and the understudy would be standing in as Iago. Actually, he did pretty well, but was always slightly fumbling his lines so you were always brought back to the fact that this is not Iago, this is an actor playing Iago. Not his fault I guess.
But, but ... couldn't hear half of what Othello was saying, particularly when he got angry - his diction was very poor. The sense of pathos in the death scene was non-existent - hence all the tittering in the audience at the points of (supposedly) highest drama. Also, why pretend to have walls in Desdemona's bedroom if you're always walking or falling through them?
Roderigo(?) was particularly poor, a sort of sub-Manuel pastiche. Play it for laughs by all means, but be clear why. None of us were, I think.
The two female leads and the musicians were very good. I felt sorry for them at the incompetence around them.
As my wife said when we left - "not the RSC's finest hour". - Simon Martin