Pondorous & self-absorbed. We left at the interval. - Wesley Henderson-Roe
05 Jan 08
Not knowing a great deal about Coward's plays, I thought it was about time I saw one live and I popped in to the NT at 7 to see if there were any cut price tickets for the night's performance. There were, and my initial impression was to be very impressed by the lovely set. I thought that Alex Jennings had lots of presence, although he wasn't quite suave enough to be the kind of leading man I associate with Coward. But he was utterly convincing within the limits of his part and did a great job - you were looking at him all the time and wanted to hear what he would say next. However, even he couldn't save the second act. I have rarely seen anything as bad as Joanna, the so-called temptress. She was wooden and unseductive, stomping around on the stage and sometimes not appearing to know what to do with her own limbs. She also didn't seem to believe in anything she was saying. In fact, I wondered if it was an understudy drafted in at the last minute and not the actress named in the cast list who seemed to have a string of credits and awards. (I won't be cruel enough to name her). It was almost embarrassing and consequently, the act got only a few uneasy titters from the audience, and my partner and I with mutual accord decided to leave at the interval. We just didn't feel we could stand another hour or so of squirming. We both felt the direction was weak, since there was an uncertain tone to the whole production, with actors talking upstage at times and some really odd delivery - as though the actors were trying to talk and act all posh like 1930s socialites but ending up sounding like you and me trying to talk posh instead. Sorry to be so harsh but I don't usually chuck money away by leaving at the interval either. This is a no-no, but I'm giving it 2 rather than 1 because the set and Alex were so good, and there were some nice supporting performances. - Jenny2write
29 Dec 07
There's something a bit wooden about this production. Characters who are supposed to be sexy/irresistible (Gary/Joanna)are not,the lines have something of the 'declaimed' about them (ex-wife/secretary), or the funny business isn't funny (Maule/housekeeper). The play is not old or good enough to be a classic, and its point about acting/feeling/role playing is questionable. The audience applauded the set! Quite right too. - kilburncat
22 Dec 07
Found it rather dated and slightly tedious during the first half but then it really warmed up and was very funny and most enjoyable. Alex Jennings is brilliant, and the supporting cast were excellent. Sorry we didn't come to the post-show reception but we were quite tired and had a longish drive home. - Gillian
16 Nov 07
Always a fan of anything Alex Jennings is doing and this production does not dissappoint! Fine acting from both Jennings and the supporting team. The set is a bit blue/green-ish, Joanna is not the suductress she is supposed to be and a few of the lines are a bit over-the-top but these tiny details do not deminish a wonderful, wonderful performance by all. Two thumbs up! - Kate
14 Nov 07
Mmhh! Well I hadn'd read the luke warm reviews before seeing this, but had heard rumours that not all was well with it. After one and a half hours I couldn't take anymore, so left at the interval. Alex Jennings is a fine actor. He did lots of business. But he aint right! It's as simple as that. This was a stodgy production that lumbered along. Coward would be turning in his grave. Where was the zing? Lines at times went for nothing. Contrary to one opinion here the only thing towering over this production was the set which was magnificent, the NT at their finest, and helped me through the first half! LOL. I had the good fortune to see a production of Present Laughter Stratford ON, Canada, five years ago with the wonderfull Brian Bedford as Gary Essendine, alas Mr Jennings was no match for him. NT must try harder. 4/10. See me! - rds
04 Nov 07
I'd meant to put 4 stars, so here's 5 to correct the average! - Gareth James
12 Oct 07
I'd been looking forward to this since it was announced by the NT. The critical reception rather dampened my enthusiasm. I'd had a bad day by the time I entered the Lyttleton! I am now completely baffled by the critics. Are they too jaded to have fun? Was there something wrong on the opening night? Am I too easy to please? This is a much better play that more frequently revived Coward plays like Private Lives and Hay Fever. Tim Hatley has created a great Bohemian loft and perfect period costumes. Sarah Woodward and Sara Stewart give excellent supporting performances. Pip Carter's cameo as Roland Maule is terrific. Towering above all of this is Alex Jennings masterclass in comic acting. The cheers from the audience suggest that they, like I, thought it was first class and great fun. GO! - Gareth James
12 Oct 07
Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant! Great cast, fantastic set and costumes, spot on direction and one of the best Noel Coward's. The best night out I've had in ages. - Laura