No wonder the Scandinavians have such a high suicide rate if this is what they grow up with. The Enchantment makes Ibsen and Strindberg look like Ray Cooney farces and could only have been written by a woman with a very limited and unhappy experience of love. The Cottesloe production is not heped by being staged in the round leaving large proportions of the audience staring at the back of an actor's head for most of each scene. The acting is uniformly excellent even from those with very small roles and there is a masterclass in scene stealing from Judith Coke bringing some welcome levity to the unremitting doom. - David Baxter
18 Oct 07
Maybe I was still high from the excitement of Macbeth the night before, but I'm afraid I found this very dull. If you like wistful and gentle plays high on atmosphere but low on action, you might like this. The first half drags a lot; the second perks up a bit - but despite the excellent acting and lovely music, this completely failed to stimulate me. - Gareth James
17 Oct 07
Dull, dull, dull. Not even a fiery performance from Niamh Cusack and the ethereal presence of Nancy Carroll could rescue this piece from trite repetitiveness. The play seems to be nothing but an excuse for the unhappy Benedictsson to indulge her self-absorption. The most disappointing production I have seen at the NT this year. And PLEASE, when will the Cottesloe do something about those dreadful thick wooden barriers which hide so much of the action from those members of the audience not lucky enough to be sitting in the pit? - sc
03 Oct 07
I went in with intangibly low expectations but ended up enjoying it more than I thought I would. In essence, I can't entirely disagree with some of the reservations expressed below (except the one about it being feminist and PC - can't see that at all) but it managed to win me over. I enjoyed all the performances although there were no real standouts. I'm not usually a fan of Zubin Varla and, again, I can see why some would have a problem with him in this role but it worked for me. There was an overall clarity about the production that I liked and I found the atmosphere quite compelling. So I ended up doing quite well out of it but I can see that this is mostly going to be one that gets a thumbs-down. - Sycamore Flint
29 Aug 07
I sat in the front row and was most dissapointed with this play being performed in the round as for most of the play there were various pieces of furniture and standing actors in the line of view. The acting was excellent although the play as a whole failed to ignite any interest in any of the characters. Not for someone who wants a thrilling night at the theatre. - Ivor
25 Aug 07
Miscast in all three leading roles. And dull. - Jan B
19 Aug 07
This is one of the best plays I have seen at the National in recent years. Its a fantastic find of a seldom perferformed peice and the acting is top notch. But I would have to say its not for everyone. I loved but I could easily see how others would not. - rtt
16 Aug 07
The two stars for the staging. Why bother with it in the first place? What is going on at our NT? This was as dull as ditch water. The casting was all to cock. Tedious, tedious, tedious. I nearly left at the interval, but was promised, by one of the ushers, that it was better in the secong half. How wrong was he! Don't waste your hard earned money on this tripe. Mr Hytner - GET A BLOODY GRIP! - rds
12 Aug 07
Was quite disappointed by this ponderous production. Despite the valiant efforts of the luminous Nancy Carroll, I kept thinking that the heroine should just pull herself together. Although intermittently interesting, the show seems longer than it's two and a half hour length, and some of the supporting acting is wretched, unusual for the NT. Niamh Cusack's rivalling friend gains in strength as the show goes on, but Zubin Varla is horribly miscast as a sort of homme fatal. Hardly a must see. - ajh
11 Aug 07
This is an excellent production of an not very relevant play. It's interesting in parts, well-played, but the overall message seems to be better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. The characterisations are finely nuanced and the evening is enhanced by the 3-piece orchestra but it's difficult to know why they put this one on instead of many other alternatives. - kilburncat
02 Aug 07
I have to say the play is at times rather slow, however the top notch performances and wonderful period look make it a fantastic night out. - bob banks
29 Jul 07
I mostly agree about the nonseness of this play. It's dated, boring and miscasted. There is no sexual tension between the leadings (in fact he is the most unattractive leading man I've seen in years - no sex appeal at all). But I'm afraid not even a change on that could save the play!! - Tino
29 Jul 07
Yawn. This should fulfill the NT's quota for daffy feminist political correctness for years to come. Not dramatic, not funny, not clever, pure theatrical Nembutal! - Joesmith