Gareth James, a regular contributor to this site, has now repeated the ultimate heresy - is Harold Pinter overrrated? Well Gareth, I have to agree with you, albeit I suspect based on less experience than yours. The Hothouse is undoubtedly chilling but ultimately what is the point? State-run institutions are a bad thing especially when the lunatics are running the asylum. It was certainly not worth battling against the cursed tube strike just for that. - David Baxter
06 Sep 07
Brilliant, funny, unnerving, faultless performances, stunning design, superb music - can't reccommend it highly enough. - KJC
02 Sep 07
Another must see at the National - Ivor
25 Aug 07
I meant to give it 4* but the wos code was difficult to read so I'll give it a 5 now. - kilburncat
02 Aug 07
This is a marvellous production of an intriguing and absorbing work, superbly played by the restrained cast, Of course you have to like the Pinter structure and elusiveness otherwise you would find it frustrating but this is so well done, and there are such funny moments that it's a wonderful evening in the theatre. It does help to know the context in which it was written to get the most out of it. - kilburncat
02 Aug 07
For the first time I really enjoyed a Pinter play! Whoopee! However, I suspect it would have been a very different experience without this superb cast and the deft direction of Ian Rickson. Infact, without putting too finer point on it, it could have been tortuous without them. I've harboured doubts about Mr Pinter's literary sincerity for a long while. Eastend boy made good, charming his way into a stuffy Englsih establishment of the 1950s. There's more than a whiff of the Emperor's new clothes about him for my liking, but yesterday some of those doubts fell away as I journeyed with him into this nightmarish, yet strangely familiar, landscape he has brilliantly conjured up. It's as if Guantanamo Bay were run by the NHS of the 50s - on acid! The downside was I sat in one of those lousy seats they insist on keeping in the first four rows of the Lyttelton. OK! I only paid a tenner, but that's because I couldn't get a better seat closer to the stage. You must see the actors faces, believe me it's worth the sore bum. But please Mr Hytner get them replaced before the next season. - rds
28 Jul 07
Superb performances, design and direction but this play does not stand the test of time and, at two and a half hours, feels very long. - fred
27 Jul 07
OK, I give up. I've participated in much of this recent Pinter revival, but I still think his plays are self-satisfied, over-rated and pretentious. Even a crack cast and the NT production values can't hide the fact that this is a dull 150 minutes..... - Gareth James
27 Jul 07
Menacing and funny. very funny. Pinter has influenced so many people - certainly Bird/Fortune as Phil Warren suggests, and I also saw shades of the Fast Show "suits you, Sir" routine. Not to mention Lush's (Paul Ritter) resemblance to Sebastian from Little Britain. - Polly Carey
23 Jul 07
I laughed loudly from first to last. I understand that having written this play Pinter "forgot" about it for many years. I would have otherwise thought it informed those marvellous sketches of John Bird and John Fortune on the Rory Bremner programme. Brilliant performances from Finbar Lynch and Paul Ritter who compete for their boss's (Stephen Moore) esteem - though neither have respect for him. Lia Williams is excellent as the only female member of the cast, and Leo Bill's cameo of the newcomer, Lamb, is a gem. I saw it on the first preview night and so there was a way to go to get it running quite smoothly, but I strongly recommend this play. - Phil Warren