Quantcast

Reader Reviews


Jerry Springer - The Opera (Lyttelton (National Theatre), West End)

Back to Show Details
ScoreCommentDate
starIt's NOT A MUSICAL! It has singing, but that's all you can say for it...it's boring, repetitive, messy, uninspirational, time-wasting, idiotic and gives theatre a bad name in too many ways to list right now. Why it's performed in a theatre is beyond me...imagine having to sit still for several hours, not even being able to scream at the cast to SHUT UP with the unwitty, idiotic comments. They might as well just make it up as they go along...it's not hard...just swear a bit, and there you have it. NOT a musical. Sorry. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.254.0.34)11 Jul 04
starstarstarstarHaving seen it at the National, I got some £25 day tickets (front row, excellent value) and hit the Cambridge. Whilst it lacked the crisp energy and freshness of the National production, it was good to see that the humour was still as apparent. David Badella is occasionally replaced with a different performer (I've forgotten his name), as when I saw it. He's more of an operatic singer, with a greater range. But, he lacks the slyness and prescence of Badella and doesn't do the part justice. There have been a few more cast changes too - Andrea has been replaced with a smaller, less powerful singer and, more importantly, Dwight/God is now played by a relatively tiny man with no prescence or charisma whatsoever. Benjamin Lake was brilliant in the original production, his huge physique was most fitting. There have also been a few changes in the ensemble, to create a less contrasted group of individuals. I wanted to catch it before Brandon is replaced on the 12th July. He was just as spectacular this time as before. Jerry Springer The Opera is one of those productions you love or you hate. I love it, and will always love it, because it was, and to some extent, still is, a refreshing concept that goes against a lot of what some have come to espect in today's productions. I'm sick of all those who say that people who like Jerry Springer The Opera are somewhat "easily amused". The production is clever, cynical and groundbreaking - it's a shame some can't accept that it does this with a rock-bottom tone, disgusting language and stereotypes. Crouch's design is simply thrilling, and, I'm glad to see, unchanged for the Cambridge. In particular, the last 20 minutes are fabulous design-wise. But, the most impressive element in JSTOpera is the score - just brilliant. Anyone that finds it necessary to criticise the music are clearly not educated in music. It's full of musically-sacred motifs and ingenious plays-on-techniques. The greatest moment of the show is the melisma between Satan and Jesus, with Steve the Security Guy in the middle. It's neo-classicism at it's most disturbing. But, the show has lost some of its sparkle, so fans of the original production, don't get your hopes up too high. It will be interesting to see in a couple of month's time though, when most of the cast would have changed. I also think it will be just as much a hit on Broadway as well - that is, if the Americans can accept the parody. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.194.12)10 Jul 04
starstarstarstarstarWow..... The BEST thing I have ever seen - USER: Whatsonstage.com (82.211.73.66)30 Jun 04
starstarsaw Jerry last night, and although I enjoyed it, I feel that it would work better as a musical rather than an opera as some of the song were difficult to understand, the concept was very good though:-) - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.254.0.34)17 Jun 04
starAbsolute nonsense. I cannot believe a show such as this can be shown in London! The language was shocking, the "acting" was appalling, the singing was incomprehensible and the plot was like my worst ever visit to the dentist. One good thing - the actor playing Jerry Springer was very good and the actor playing the warm-up guy/devil had a good vocal range (just a shame the words were rubbish). - USER: Whatsonstage.com (12.39.71.54)14 Jun 04
starstarTepid. Especially after seeing the very excellent US-themed comedy "Americana Absurdum" over in Southwark. Some game performers in "Jerry", but they could only take the material so far. If you want a rewarding Yank day, attend the Edward Hopper exhibition at the Tate, get a pint, then book a seat for the "Americana" piece. What West End show can be recommended? Democracy? -CN - USER: Whatsonstage.com (24.90.10.251)12 Jun 04
starstarstaramazing shawntel was hot!!!!!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.31.98.228)25 May 04
starSimply the worst thing I've ever seen in London - I suspect the only reason this show has got any publicity is the swearing, as the rest of it is not worth mentioning. Definite case of "emperor's new clothes". A waste of a couple of hours of my life. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (193.130.19.189)19 May 04
starstarI was thoroughly disappointed with this show especially after all the hype. I saw a Friday night performance in a half empty Cambridge Theatre and found the whole evening to be rather flat and dull. The cast didn't appear to be making much of an effort and many of the apparent comic monents were lost through bad diction and quiet performances. For example I suspect we were suspected Shawntel's aspiration to be a pole dancer funny.....at this performance the role was played by Sarah Ryan and the joke was lost as Sarah just wasn't totally inconceivable as a pole dancer! The whole thing was diffficult and awkward to watch. As so many other people seem to think it's fantastic, I am hoping that I just happened to see a bad performance. However, this is West End...there shouldn't be bad performances. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.5.160.6)29 Apr 04
starA big disappointment. Once the shock value wears off (after about 10 minutes), it becomes extremely boring - unless you are a pea-brain who will laugh at anything rude (and there were plenty of them in our audience). Thought the music was awful too. David Bedella is obviously very tallented, but his talents are sadly wasted in this "show". - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.40.3.65)15 Apr 04
starPITIFUL....a one joke show and you've heard it within the first five minutes...The concept is great but they need some real songs and a witty book with a total rewrite. Possibly the most overrated show ever. How does it get such good reviews -- because people are prepared to laugh at anything Jerry Springer related no matter how unclever. Not, repeat not, worth 50 quid. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (170.148.92.53)29 Mar 04
starstarstarstarstarThe operatic advert breaks are a work of genius! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (128.40.79.243)22 Mar 04
starSorry, but dont understand why anyone thought it was any good, Ive seen more musicals than i can remember, and this was the worst by a long way. No tunes that you would remember, poor singers and just not worth £50. If you want to spend £50 this month in the West End, book for The Producers !!! Trust me, its the best show EVER !! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.17.115.232)07 Mar 04
starstarstarstarstarWent on Sat night. Was thinking wouldn't it be great if it swopped the Olivers and it has! Where else would you see tap dancing Klu Klax Clan members and falsettos from trailer trash. This is one of the bravest shows to hit the West End. With some older musicals loking tired and the rest consisting of pop's greatest hits- Jerry wins hands down. Not for the easily offended. But if you like your shows to be edgy, relevant and most of all hilarious- Jerry if for you. Make this your Jerry Springer moment! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.122.191.77)23 Feb 04
starstarstarstarstarSaw this at a half empty matinee. It was no less ejoyable though- just a shame as the cast worked like dogs. This is not for the easily offended. But what it does offer the audience is a bawdy, original and funny night out. Ok, there is a real lack of emotion. You won't feel moved to tears- but this isn't Tosca. The cast are all amazing, the sets have real depth and the songs although not- sing-a-long are hilarious and real one offs. An excellent night out. Ignore the price and go. It is Value for money. Go Jerry! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.122.14.191)22 Feb 04
starstarstarstarstarAbsolutley Amazing. This is the sort of show which makes you re-assess the current state of Muscial Theatre. An inspired and inventive piece, quite unlike anything I have seen before. I just wish I could see it every week. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (194.200.154.253)29 Jan 04
starThe 1st 10 mins were good and clever but soon after Jerry enters the show goes downhill. The show is very pointless and not really that funny. Its not a show for opera fans. Its really a show for narrow minded people who get a kick out of hearing the F word over and over again. Probably the most stupid show i've ever seen and yes im a regular theatre goer! The last good musical was RENT and since then most musicals suck - USER: Whatsonstage.com (66.119.33.170)23 Jan 04
starstarstarstarstargreat show!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.86.241.122)18 Dec 03
starstarstarstarstarThis show is definitely WOW! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.253.64.6)14 Dec 03
starstarstarstarstarwow spelt backwards is wow! there is nothing like this show, it blew me away! the cast are superb (david bedella and alison jiear really rock. richard thomas and stewart lee have really hit something here. if you're not easily offended and have an ear for great music, go and see it!!!!!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.48.229.83)22 Nov 03
starstarstarstarstarThis is my Jerry Springer moment ... what a fantastic show! I've seen it through the scratch performances at BAC, then the National and now the West End - hoorah! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.19.90.93)12 Nov 03
starstarstarstarstarInnovative, exciting, tuneful and VERY funny. Act 2 just absolutely brilliant. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.137.154.18)11 Nov 03
starstarstarstarwell Jerry came to push his own show and the 1st night went wild. still one of the best sung shows to be found in the WE today. as talked on here the leads picked out are still fab but so are David and Benjamin and Valda - just WOW. I do still feel act 2 takes a real dip and we have to get through the first 20mins to get us back on top. act 1 still works in a total rounded way. is there enough people out there to keep this going? or was the NT sell out the lot - well time will tell but this is not an out of town coach party show. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.13.129.151)11 Nov 03
starstarstarstarstarIs Andrew Bevis and Alison Jiear back in it yet? - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.137.82.29)05 Nov 03
starstarstarstarstarI just saw the show for the second time. The first time I saw it at tnational and now have seen it at the cambridge. I was worried it might not be as good or that it might have been cut down but it is better.It seems to suit a conventional theatre more and I thought the show was absolutely brilliant the best thing I have seen in the West End for ages.You must see this show. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.134.214.70)05 Nov 03
starstarstarstarstarAbsolutely brilliant! Love it! All the cast are amazing! especially Andrew Bevis, David Bedella and Alison Jiear! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.137.83.7)01 Nov 03
starstarstarstarstarOK well i havent seen it but jst the title gives me a slight giggle... and that does it for me.... so im defrinately gonna go... will ut a second review up as soon as i get home from the show... bisous - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.48.250.229)29 Oct 03
starstarstarstarstarThe show in London, miss it at your peril. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (132.185.144.12)28 Oct 03
starstarstarPeople wo leave during intervals are just not real theatregoers. You should always stick it out. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.1.29.11)26 Oct 03
starstarstarstarstarBrilliant - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.128.119.117)27 Sep 03
starstarstarstarAn amazing show that kept me riveted despite a massive case of jet lag. It gets redundant in the first act and loses focus in the second act (and God comes in a poor second to Satan when it comes to casting), but this is a must-see musical. Give it an extra half-star for originality. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (12.107.15.2)25 Sep 03
starstarstarstarstarQuite simply the best and funniest show I have ever seen .It is a musical in the top six.For funny it tops The Producers. For originality it is up there with Hair, Chorus Line and West Side Story. I absolutely loved it - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.128.119.117)21 Sep 03
starstarstarstarstarQuite simply the best and funniest show I have ever seen .It is a musical in the top six.For funny it tops The Producers. For originality it is up there with Hair, Chorus Line and West Side Story. I absolutely loved it - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.128.119.117)21 Sep 03
starI wanted to like this. Really, I did. I was expecting it to be wonderful; instead, I think it was possibly the least enjoyable evening I've ever spent in a theatre. The concept - the operatic contrast with the language - is terribly clever and original, a really great idea. Sadly, the show itself is just stupid - actually - and I never thought this would be possible! - less good than the TV show. There are only so many times I can hear someone sing "What the f*ck" and find it entertaining. It's just so juvenile; it seems to be based on the fact that someone singing swear words is funny. The cast is very good (especially whoever is playing the Devil), and the idea is interesting - it's just a shame that the excecution is so dire. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.67.69)17 Sep 03
starstarstarstarstarSaw this last might for the second time. I agree with all your four and five star reviewers. This is a magnificently innovative piece and marks a major development in musical theatre. Yes, it uses four letter words and is adult entertainment but not everything has to be for all the family. I was delighted to see that the audience was of a wide age range and they all loved it. When I first saw it earlier this year, I was not sure about Michael Brandon but he is now firmly in control. The singing and production are thrilling. Long may it continue. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.34.13)13 Sep 03
starstarstarstarIt's a pretty astonishing evening, I can tell you! Tap-dancing Klu Klux Klan. A husband who wants to be his wife's 'baby'. The Chick with the.... Very, very rude and very, very funny - I was in stitches from the moment the cast filed on. There are some terrific voices in the energetic cast - particularly Benjamin Lake, who plays Dwight and God, and David Bedella, who has great stage presence as the warm-up man and The Devil. True, the second act drags a bit and you get the feeling that it's lost its way, but the finale (just when you thought it was over) is wonderful. Andrew B - USER: Whatsonstage.com (193.130.127.205)28 Jul 03
starstarstarstarI went to see this Production back in April 03. I went along not knowing what to expect from this production only having watched the Jerry Springer show on Television.But I was really suprised. You get a Jerry Springer show on stage and more.. The Sets and lighting are breath taking to say the least. Singing and Dancing spot on. This is a night out at the theatre you will never forget. Please be warned though this production is for people aged 18+. Its is not a show for the younger ones. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.5.40.24)29 Jun 03
starstarstarstarstarAndrew Bevis has an absolutely outstanding voice. All the cast have good voices and Michael Brandon is spot on with Jerry Springer. Brilliant show......a lot of fun! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.137.88.43)23 Jun 03
starstarstarstarstarI have seen many new and old preductions around the country but never have I seen such an amazing work of art! The voices of the performers were incredible, costumes and characters spot on! A show full off 100% entertainment, do not miss this one, kill for a ticket if you have too! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.86.68.80)11 Jun 03
starstarstarstarstarSaw this and Caligula a few days apart - a pretty polarising experience, but loved them both. This was a very brave piece of theatre, ridiculous in the extreme, but performed with such endless enthusiasm that it was impossible not to love it. The 'audience' have a stellar line in insults, and though the 2nd half is perhaps not quite as much fun, the final encore number more than makes up for it. Inspired. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.113.17.219)21 May 03
starstarstarI wasn't as taken by the show as most of the other reviewers here. I thought the first half worked very well, as it basically stuck to the Jerry Springer show premise of having an assortment of odd-bods come on stage and talk - or sing, in this case - about their various proclivities and problems. It was the second Act, where the action is set in Hell, that I found less entertaining. For me it was like the producers had, literally, lost the plot - the action suddenly went from the focussed area of the TV show and studio to a camp Hell where you had the likes of Jesus, the Devil and Jerry battling it out. I clearly missed the point of this, and it left me feeling that if I'd left at the interval I'd have enjoyed the show more. I think there was enough fire and brimstone in the fictional studio without having to visit the depths of Hell. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (213.38.32.137)19 May 03
starstarstarstarstarWhat an absolutely amazing experience. Crude, crass, in your face offensive at times, I loved every minute. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.152.89.74)19 May 03
starstarstarstarIt *is* good, but not *great*. It's fun, certainly, but it is essentially built around the single joke of having the guests' lines delivered in high operatic style. (It's not that new a joke though - remember Monserrat Caballe singing 'I should be so lucky'?) The inherent flaw in such a project, though, is that in satirising something essentially banal and (for all its freakery) quotidian, the musical never quite transcends the original material. The second act attempts this, but apart from some deliciously blasphemous iconoclasm (Jesus: "Actually I am a bit gay") it feels a bit of a mess, with the primal struggle between good and evil reduced to little more than a neighbours' squabble. But maybe that's the point. JSTO is a series of brilliant set pieces - the KKK routine is inspired, like Mel Brooks at his best - but doesn't have much in the way of either narrative or character psychology to really engage an audience. Not that the audience I was in seemed to care that much. It *is* a breath of fresh air to have something like this at the National. It deserves to do well, and I hope it will help to bring in (badly needed) new audiences to this theatre. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.92.67.66)08 May 03
starstarstarstarstarOne of the best musicals I have ever seeen, and certainly the funniest. I first saw this in Edinborough the day Springer was there! I thought it was a bit shaky, but they have patched it up and it is brilliant. Praise must obviously mainly go to Richard Thomas and Stewart Lee who are comic genius's, my English teacher went to uni with Thomas and says he was hilarious to be round. Praise must also go to Nick Hytner the new national director, for putting on such a daring show in one of his bigger national theatres, this surely shows that he is bringing the national out of the chirpy nunn musicals. It is even more hilarious to see the reactions of the older audience members who clearly dont know who Jerry Springer is, and came to see an opera!They were the percentage who did not give a standing ovation to the spot on cast. For anyone booking be warned if you are very religious you may well find the second act very offensive, and do not take kids, but for the rest of you book now, and get to the south bank. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.40.0.224)04 May 03
starstarstarstarstarWith some trepidation, I took four Icelanders and one Lithuanian. I made them watch an episode of JS a few nights before, as they hadn't seen the TV show. Everyone enjoyed it, which is some tribute. Personnally, I thought it was stunning and have already booked to go again in 10 days time. It sweeps through the National like a giant breath of fresh air. Gold star to Nicholas Hytner and the RNT for bravery and imagination - what a cracking start! A handfull of gold stars to Tom Morris and BAC without which this sort of show would never get developed. A sackfull of gold stars to Richard Thomas and Stewart Lee for breaking the mould of musical theatre like no-one has in more than 20 years. To London's theatregoers - conclusive proof that we're born lucky to live here and be able to share in this excitement. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (212.211.102.35)03 May 03
starstarstarstarstarThis is one of the best shows I have seen in the past 20 years or so. I am already booking to see it again. The shocks and laughs of the audience at times drowned some of the beautiful choral singing. One or two of the "arias" were genuinely moving - especially the lady who dreams of being a pole dancer. What starts as a really good and innovative show just keeps on getting better and better. GM. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (170.66.1.123)02 May 03
starstarstarstarstarWhat can I say? AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.154.44.162)01 May 03
starstarstarstarstarAs a fan of both classical opera (preferring DonG to Wozzeck) and the cabaret musicals of Weill/Brecht (or Weill/anyone), I was totally smitten by this Richard Thomas fusion of the two when I saw it in Edinburgh last Summer. It was made more electric by the presence of the real JerryS a few rows in front, as most of the circle audience kept glancing over to see his reaction - he seemed generally amused, though he did declare “None of it is true” at the interval, presumably a reference to pronouncements made by his inner Valkyrie and/or his prostitute incident! I was therefore intrigued to know what changes had been made for the “premier” completed version staged at the National, and booked for the 3rd preview performance. The new version is even more stunning, mainly through: big bucks spent on a great set (base background seems OK though bit odd in 1st half, but obviously geared for 2nd half); pyrotechnics (real fiery cross & fire of Hell!); lots of added choreography; trims & rewrites to sharpen 2nd half - aided by tech effects; innovative end section which reintroduces musical pizzazz following the original fade-down ending. It was also good to see that most of the main parts were played by the original singers (the nappy-lady has such a perfect pitch for “dip me in chocolate & throw me to the lesbians“ and all of her other arias). The new JS looks less like the original than the Edinburgh chap (who we could of course compare with the real JS), but he is nearer in voice/intonation. The only down-side change I could see was that JC had swapped his nappy from the 1st half for a shiny pharaoh-wrap in the 2nd - a bit too Lloyd-Webber(ish) for my liking! I agree with the WoS reviewer that this show should develop an instant cult following. In fact I will be in the forefront for this as we have just bought tickets to see it (for the 3rd time) in May. I have also been lobbying friends to book before it sells out - or develops a 3 month waiting list if is does do a West End transfer. My wife tells me that mainstream London audiences are less likely to accept the constant profanities and clear blasphemies that Edinburgh audiences almost expects of Fringe productions, but I feel that: a) most London theatre goers will appreciate the need for satires to shock in order to make them think of the subject matter; b) as Anna Russell said of the absurdities in Wagner‘s Ring Cycle “You can get away with anything providing you sing it“. Final advice for potential audience: It does help to have some familiarity with the JS show (I bought a JS video from a charity shop) to fully appreciate what is being satirised, and to judge whether you will be offended or not. The few previous reviewers who had a negative reaction were presumably JS virgins (“raped by a panto“ as the chorus might say!). It is NOT an opera in the conventional sense, although all lines except JS’s are sung in a mix of opera or musical show styles, which makes it nearer the classical definition than say Carmen. Imagine it more as a Weill musical with Berg/Schoenberg style arias and JS show issues/profanities. Your mental reaction to such a weird mix should tell you whether to book or not. Alasdair - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.225.196.142)30 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarAmazing! I love NT productions, this is their best production since March 2001 when My Fair Lady, now at Drury Lane, was produced, Everything made me feel I was in Jerry Springer. There is a lot of bad language; don't go if easily offended but go if you want a great night of high-class entertainment. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (194.105.168.6)30 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarAbsolutely amazing!!!!! I have never laughed so much in all my life - and especially not at the national theatre!! Yes, there is a lot of swearing (!!!) but there is a lot more to the comedy than just that!!! Go and see it now before the queues for returns are too long!!!! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.13)30 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarJerry Springer is quite possibly one of the most original shows EVER produced in London. Both hysterically funny and shocking at the same time, I will be rushing back for more. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (217.44.140.176)30 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarMagnificent. A hilarious evening superbly acted,sung and directed. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.93.50.13)30 Apr 03
starI found this rubbish to be an over emphasized load of nonsensical swearing and utter tripe unfit for human consumption. This musical is nothing more than a collection of cliches and uninteresting musical gibberish unworthy of the OPERA title. It was not worth the bother of the train ticket to get to the theatre. Don't waste your time with this crap stay home and knit some socks for the winter. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.26.103.88)30 Apr 03
starstarThe first act was just lifted from the show...remind to do Eurotrash it's so easy........the second was more interesting but the ensemble could have shut up for a while, some really nice tunes but for all the input this has had over two years....wouldn't recommend it to friends unless they love jerry Springer - USER: Whatsonstage.com (81.26.103.88)30 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarAmazing singing. The contrast between the completely uplifting music and the stream of swearwords is hilarious and totally unique. There is just about some kind of moral to this tale, but really it is just aurally and visually stunning to bother about messages. I loved it. Liz - USER: Whatsonstage.com (139.222.250.217)27 Apr 03
starstarstarstarA really unusual and throughly entertaining night out. I'm not sure I'd recommend it to my elderly mother (or to some of my much less elderly friends), but it's a long time since I've smiled so much in the theatre or laughed so much at a musical. The casting was superb, the performances excellent (especially Satan) and the musical itself is endlessly inventive. Like so many others, I was a little wary, but thank God for the WOS event, which encouraged me to try something I thought I wouldn't like. Being in such good seats also helped! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.217.255.161)24 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarBrilliant. Refreshingly different to anything currently (ever?) in the WestEnd. Great cast who looked like they were having as much fun as we were. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (195.102.142.238)24 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarBrilliant. Went along not really knowing anything about the show, but found myself chuckling along for almost the whole time. Can't think of any other show that has put a smile on my face for over two hours straight. Such a refreshing show so different to all the others. Finale at the end of Act One is absolutely outstanding, the only thing surpassing it in the West End was the finale at the end of Act Two (won't give it away) but it easily triggered a standing ovation. The Jerry Springer character is very good, but for me the star of the show was Michael Bedella's Warm Up Guy. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.49.29.221)23 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarI saw this last night (part of the WOS group that went, as usual, en masse) after having been bullied into buying a ticket. All I can say is, thank goodness for bullying. I really did think it was going to be lousy but that it "had" to be seen nonetheless. One of those things you had to have an opinion about. I didn't expect one of the funniest shows I have seen in years with plot twists, immense humour, brilliant songs and utter lunacy - AND its at the National Theatre. Leave your prejudices at home and go and take a look. This show is, imho, going to be massive. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.193.222.20)23 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarWent to see this as part of the whatsonstage group outing. I didn't really know what to expect, but my attention was grabbed right from the start, and sustained right until the final devilish moments. I was completely entertained the whole time. It was an absolute riot, and it was so stimulating to be able to see, and enjoy, something that is so different. Oh, and packed house and great atmosphere! Standing ovation at the end etc. I'd go and see that again anytime. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.252.0.5)23 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarSaw the show last night and thought it was very good. This has got to transfer to the west end. - USER: Whatsonstage.com (62.255.64.5)17 Apr 03
starstarstarstarWell!!! What a show! Approached the production cautiously, fearing that I would either absolutely love it or loath it, and found myself hugely entertained. The first act is stunning, followed by a messy and less satisfactory second. The piece is still in preview and some moments could be cut (sometimes it steps too far into bad taste) but on the whole found it a wonderfully refreshing and UNIQUE night out. How wonderful to see a new musical work that can stand alone, breaking away from all the traditional rules. The cast, without exception, is outstanding. The singing for this production has to be heard to be believed - ASTONISHING! I was truly blown away by the vocals and the acting was top notch as well. Brilliant set (though the second act relies too much on stage wizadry). Interestingly though, my friend found Act II much better than the first. Personally, I didn't think it wrapped the show up at all well - was hoping for something deeper behind the mayhem and abuse, which was delivered in Jerry's "thought for the day", but I felt it was a case of too little too late. Still,there's time for more fleshing out and equally some trimming before opening night. The concept is truly ingenious, and pulled off stunningly. As it stands, a terrific night out and a sharp comment on the disgrace that is modern society... But I hope they make it even sharper! - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.193.222.20)17 Apr 03
starstarstarstarstarI went to see Jerry the other night and thought it was brilliant. Only the resources of the National Theatre could have developed such a great night of enetertainemt. Its funny, witty and a real opportunity to bring new audiences to the theatre. I hope we get more exciting operas/musicals like it... - USER: Whatsonstage.com (80.193.222.20)14 Apr 03
Write a Review
Give us your opinion on this entry, give it a score (1 is low) and a comment
Score:
Comment:
Name:
Required, will appear on website
Email:
Required, will not appear on website
Confirm: Please type in
Please enter this number > EIGHTY-NINE < Just the two digits only, without any spaces.


Friends Email: Your Email: Comment: