The Ongoing Wicked Discussion Thread
Started by tsxmitw, Aug 12 2009 10:39 PM
6808 replies to this topic
#6281
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:27 PM
Urgh the Daily Mail have published an article - they have included more photos !
#6282
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:36 PM
What a mess. The line from the 'insider' about Gina 'putting herself out there as this squeaky-clean actress' seems particularly spiteful coming apparently from a colleague. Such a horrible and awkward situation.
#6283
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:37 PM
Crumbs alive, that one is even worse.
#6284
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:38 PM
acapella, on 03 March 2013 - 10:36 PM, said:
What a mess. The line from the 'insider' about Gina 'putting herself out there as this squeaky-clean actress' seems particularly spiteful coming apparently from a colleague. Such a horrible and awkward situation.
#6285
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:41 PM
Wow .... That article is bad!
#6286
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:43 PM
Would a cast member really have been able to get those pictures without them noticing?
#6287
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:47 PM
Probably not, but could have got someone else to do it or the paper could have got them after being tipped off. No doubt that someone on the inside has been talking judging by the quotes in the articles, and there's clearly no love lost there.
#6289
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:48 PM
I'm sorry but IF it was a cast member I think they should be made jobless
#6290
Posted 03 March 2013 - 10:51 PM
isabel, on 03 March 2013 - 10:48 PM, said:
I'm sorry but IF it was a cast member I think they should be made jobless
I think it's quite a conclusion to jump to that it was a cast member. It could have been anyone. If someone I knew was walking that closely behind me I'm pretty sure I'd notice. There's obviously a lot more to this story than what the papers have got hold of.
Edit: just seen acapella's post, which is also a good point.



















