"WDS" OBVIOUSLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT!
I KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT FIDDLER ON THE ROOF IS STILL VERY MUCH ON THE CARDS TO GO INTO TOWN. THERE WILL ONLY BE TWO PARTS RECAST (DUE TO OTHER ENGAGEMENTS) AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL CASTING BUT NO RE-CASTING!!!!!!!!!
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT NEXT TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (NO OFFENCE! LOL!)
WDS KNOWS NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Started by
Guest_LOUISA_*
, Feb 13 2007 06:55 PM
28 replies to this topic
#1 Guest_LOUISA_*
Posted 13 February 2007 - 06:55 PM
#2
Posted 13 February 2007 - 07:44 PM
"WDS" OBVIOUSLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT!
I KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT FIDDLER ON THE ROOF IS STILL VERY MUCH ON THE CARDS TO GO INTO TOWN. THERE WILL ONLY BE TWO PARTS RECAST (DUE TO OTHER ENGAGEMENTS) AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL CASTING BUT NO RE-CASTING!!!!!!!!!
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT NEXT TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (NO OFFENCE! LOL!)
I KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT FIDDLER ON THE ROOF IS STILL VERY MUCH ON THE CARDS TO GO INTO TOWN. THERE WILL ONLY BE TWO PARTS RECAST (DUE TO OTHER ENGAGEMENTS) AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL CASTING BUT NO RE-CASTING!!!!!!!!!
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT NEXT TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (NO OFFENCE! LOL!)
What does WDS stand for?
#3 Guest_Sad but true_*
Posted 13 February 2007 - 10:53 PM
Yes, all of the cast are being told this, however there is a small problem. There is not an available theatre. As a result his info is much more accurate. It's a shame, but it now does look likely that this transfer will not happen.
#4
Posted 13 February 2007 - 11:08 PM
"WDS" OBVIOUSLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT!
I KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT FIDDLER ON THE ROOF IS STILL VERY MUCH ON THE CARDS TO GO INTO TOWN. THERE WILL ONLY BE TWO PARTS RECAST (DUE TO OTHER ENGAGEMENTS) AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL CASTING BUT NO RE-CASTING!!!!!!!!!
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT NEXT TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (NO OFFENCE! LOL!)
I KNOW FOR 100% FACT THAT FIDDLER ON THE ROOF IS STILL VERY MUCH ON THE CARDS TO GO INTO TOWN. THERE WILL ONLY BE TWO PARTS RECAST (DUE TO OTHER ENGAGEMENTS) AND THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL CASTING BUT NO RE-CASTING!!!!!!!!!
GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT NEXT TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (NO OFFENCE! LOL!)
I was hoping the new notice board would get rid of much f this mud-slinging ................... but hey ho !!!
#5 Guest_louisa_*
Posted 13 February 2007 - 11:12 PM
I know for a fact that the savoy is looking likely for it. And the Picadilly is not out of the question yet either! I do know more info but can't say!!!!!
Either way it deserves to go into town- the cast is fab and the show is superb!
Where are you getting your info from by the way? Or is it just what you've heard?
Either way it deserves to go into town- the cast is fab and the show is superb!
Where are you getting your info from by the way? Or is it just what you've heard?
#6 Guest_Gary_*
Posted 13 February 2007 - 11:14 PM
Whose "mud-slinging" ?? Louisa actually said no offence and lol which obviously meant she was just making her point but in a light hearted way??
#7
Posted 14 February 2007 - 12:13 PM
Whose "mud-slinging" ?? Louisa actually said no offence and lol which obviously meant she was just making her point but in a light hearted way??
Bless you.
Did I say it wasn;t coming?
I said for a limited season pre-Grease at The Piccadilly would not be likley as it would be too little time re-coup what with new castings....so perhaps get your facts right ?
wds x
#8 Guest_Ben_*
Posted 14 February 2007 - 07:58 PM
I hate to say this but I really think wds is an arrogant know it all. who has the nerve to say "bless you" to someone?! talk about patronising!!
I am in the crew for Fiddler and can confirm that Louisa is bang on with the truth so she already has her facts straight!!
I am in the crew for Fiddler and can confirm that Louisa is bang on with the truth so she already has her facts straight!!
#9 Guest_louisa_*
Posted 14 February 2007 - 08:03 PM
Thanks for the defending Ben. I really think my first post got taken the wrong way! I was trying to share some facts and was def not meaning it to come across like I was having a go at anyone! I suspect the capitals didn't help?
Anyway- no harm was meant from my end.
Anyway- no harm was meant from my end.
#10 Guest_Hacker 2_*
Posted 14 February 2007 - 08:12 PM
Thanks for the defending Ben. I really think my first post got taken the wrong way! I was trying to share some facts and was def not meaning it to come across like I was having a go at anyone! I suspect the capitals didn't help?
Anyway- no harm was meant from my end.
Anyway- no harm was meant from my end.
It would seem that both Ben and Louisa have the same ip addresses. And so soon posting after each other too.
Maybe they share a computer. They certainly share similar sentence structure and phrasing. Perhaps they are one and the same person......I think we know the answer to that.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










This topic is locked









