Biggest Musical Theatre Flops Ever ?!
#31
Posted 30 September 2012 - 12:05 PM
#32
Posted 30 September 2012 - 12:06 PM
Jamiem, on 30 September 2012 - 06:36 AM, said:
(I do hate it when people say that (likewise with "I'm entitled to my opinion"), because it gives the impression that they think those words somehow nullify everything that has been said against them and frees them from the need to present any arguments of their own.)
Your posts so far seem to suggest that you think "flop" and "biggest flop ever" are synonymous and that any show that doesn't make a profit is a one of the biggest flops ever. Given that only a minority of shows recoup, that would mean that over half of all musical productions ever to reach the stage would qualify.
What's your definition of "biggest flop ever", and how does it differ from just "flop"?
(Edited to add...)
Or are you taking "biggest flop ever" to mean "big shows that had decent runs but still failed to recoup"? (In which case, why not say that?)
#33
Posted 30 September 2012 - 01:11 PM
I was not trying to answer an 'A' level question
#34
Posted 30 September 2012 - 01:51 PM
#35
Posted 30 September 2012 - 03:28 PM
#36
Posted 30 September 2012 - 05:06 PM
http://www.musicaltalk.co.uk
#37
Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:26 PM
Jamiem, on 29 September 2012 - 03:56 PM, said:
Marguerite
Dreamboats and petticoats
Evita
Every transfer from the chocolate factory
Jamiem, on 29 September 2012 - 03:51 PM, said:
Million dollar quartet
Betty blue eyes
Mary poppins
Cabaret
Saturday night fever
Crazy for you
Pricilla queen of the desert
Avenue Q? That can't have not recouped!
I'd also be extremely surprised if Crazy for You didn't, its set up costs beyond the Open Air production were minimal (which made money in itself) and if it didn't make money for the company it would have not had lasted six months.
Dreamboats and Petticoats may not have been that great a musical (in my eyes) but it surely also made money, else tours wouldn't still be mounted and there wouldn't be a new rumour of it coming back into town.
I know little of the stories for many of the others to be sure about. Of which production of Evita do you speak, e.g.?
#38
Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:45 PM
In a way avenue q wouldnt surprise me, ticket price was always low and sold well on the day. Id imagine it covered its running costs bit actually pay off its investment and go into profit? Possibly not. Dont forget before they changed the pricing structure, early in the run it did struggle
#39
Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:46 PM
#40
Posted 30 September 2012 - 07:58 PM
DanielWhit, on 30 September 2012 - 07:26 PM, said:
Avenue Q? That can't have not recouped!
I'd also be extremely surprised if Crazy for You didn't, its set up costs beyond the Open Air production were minimal (which made money in itself) and if it didn't make money for the company it would have not had lasted six months.
Dreamboats and Petticoats may not have been that great a musical (in my eyes) but it surely also made money, else tours wouldn't still be mounted and there wouldn't be a new rumour of it coming back into town.
I know little of the stories for many of the others to be sure about. Of which production of Evita do you speak, e.g.?
Crazy for you lost everything
Dreamboats.... Who knows really, with a Kenwright show, no investors, no public accounts
Evita, the original West End paid 8 times it's money back and the Grandage one lost money
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



















