Jump to content


Taming Of Shrew


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Jan Brock

Jan Brock

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2756 posts

Posted 25 March 2012 - 07:13 AM

I don't see a thread for this - has anyone else seen it ? A very good and interesting production, best since Greg Doran's. The only negatives are that it could have been a bit funnier and it was a very dull set as a result of it originating on the RST thrust stage (a big back wall with lots of doors and windows is already a cliche). Lucy Bailey is a very good director of Shakespeare, I hope she survives into the new Doran artistic team.

#2 dude-1981

dude-1981

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 613 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Richmond

Posted 25 March 2012 - 08:12 AM

I really didn't like it much at all.  Just seemed really flat, like everyone was trying too hard.  Not funny at all, painfully long and I'm not sure I could say Lisa Dillon has been any cop in the 3 or 4 things I've seen her in.  I much prefered the version from late last year at the Southwark Playhouse.  Worst Shakespeare I saw all week.
If, for some strange reason you care what I've seen, it's all here:

http://pcchan1981.livejournal.com/

#3 Latecomer

Latecomer

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1447 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Oxford

Posted 25 March 2012 - 08:21 AM

Saw it on the thrust stage at Stratford and loved it. For me they didn't quite nail the ending but otherwise I thought it was fabulous. I liked the chemistry between Lisa Dillon and her man.

#4 xanderl

xanderl

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1226 posts

Posted 25 March 2012 - 09:49 AM

I thought it was great. Not sure how the giant bed would translate to a normal stage

#5 Jan Brock

Jan Brock

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2756 posts

Posted 25 March 2012 - 10:01 AM

View Postxanderl, on 25 March 2012 - 09:49 AM, said:

I thought it was great. Not sure how the giant bed would translate to a normal stage

They just stuck it on the normal stage - not ideal.

#6 xanderl

xanderl

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1226 posts

Posted 25 March 2012 - 11:24 AM

This production got my 2011 award for "most disappointing nudity following a warning sign"

#7 Honoured Guest

Honoured Guest

    Dis Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1696 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 25 March 2012 - 12:03 PM

View PostJan Brock, on 25 March 2012 - 07:13 AM, said:

...it was a very dull set as a result of it originating on the RST thrust stage (a big back wall with lots of doors and windows is already a cliche).
I get your point, but that's a perennial issue with touring theatre. Any set design works better in some theatres than in others. Looking at it the other way round, an original RST production design is now much more compromised in its RST home if it's designed for touring. For example, I understand that Macbeth was fully designed and directed for the RST alone whereas The Merchant of Venice was designed and directed with a West End transfer in mind, although it never happened.

#8 Honoured Guest

Honoured Guest

    Dis Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1696 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 25 March 2012 - 12:06 PM

View Postxanderl, on 25 March 2012 - 11:24 AM, said:

This production got my 2011 award for "most disappointing nudity following a warning sign"
Obviously, this notification was made with young children in mind, not ageing sleazebags.

And I'm not  surprised it disappointed you in 2011 when the first preview was in January this year.

#9 xanderl

xanderl

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1226 posts

Posted 25 March 2012 - 12:09 PM

How dare you call me ageing!

#10 Jan Brock

Jan Brock

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2756 posts

Posted 25 March 2012 - 12:41 PM

This was like on old-style RSC production, even including on-stage urination.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users