Phantom Of The Opera ~ 2012, Uk Tour
#421
Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:19 PM
In terms of the Act I change, it depends when you saw the tour. For the first part of the tour (the change was implemented in the final week of the Bristol run) the end of Act I was less spectacular, with the chandelier kind of miserably "exploding". They changed it so the Phantom comes into Box 5 with a fire stick, shoots it towards the chandelier, the chandelier full on explodes and shakes, part of the set onstage collapses and the act ends with a final (very loud) explosion as the lights black out.
#422
Posted 13 December 2012 - 03:53 PM
#423
Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:01 PM
ABowlerHat, on 13 December 2012 - 03:19 PM, said:
Well that all completely passed me by when I saw the show in Cardiff on Saturday! Maybe I was distracted by bits of cardboard from the chandelier explosives falling on my head, but I didn't spot the Phantom or see anything collapse on stage.
#424
Posted 14 December 2012 - 12:59 PM
ABowlerHat, on 13 December 2012 - 03:19 PM, said:
Sounds the same as what happened both times I saw it on the first part of the tour in Manchester
#425
Posted 15 December 2012 - 02:57 AM
Richey, on 14 December 2012 - 12:59 PM, said:
Sounds the same as what happened both times I saw it on the first part of the tour in Manchester
The bang sounded louder in Milton Keynes than in Bristol. People really jumped. But if it serves its purpose in either place the audience won't be looking at the stage or noticing much else anyway ?
#426
Posted 15 December 2012 - 06:16 AM
#427
Posted 19 December 2012 - 05:49 PM
ABowlerHat, on 12 December 2012 - 09:34 AM, said:
Earl Carpenter is an incredible Phantom. I never thought I'd enjoy him. I listened to some recordings of him and disliked his voice, but people always said to me "You need to see him to understand" which I thought was rubbish. Then I saw him. His acting is so incredible. His grasp on the character so good. His singing is different to other big Phantoms (JOJ being the obvious example) but then again, The Phantom's voice is supposed to be a "strange, sweet sound." In terms of the tour production, I actually preferred Earl to John (NEVER thought I'd say that) but I think Earl also had the benefit of coming into the tour when the company and director had decided exactly what they were doing so all he had to do was worry about his character.
.........................................................
I don't think its a matter of maturing the production. Earl suggests he wanted to do things his way and that's what they have done. http://www.walesonli...91466-32377835/ Its a matter of what works better for whoever is watching and what the Phantom wants to do. Its obviously an issue of what you like, probably where you sit, probably what works best in what theatre, and, as the production changes, it may be different show to show, and stop to stop. When I saw the show in Milton Keynes, Earl , and some others were suffering from low sound levels, I think, which didn't help, but I thought the Phantom was underpowered for an act and a half, before bursting into life in Act Two. I wasn't alone as the people around me were also noting that the Phantom seemed less impressive than Raoul, or Christine, or even Meg. Although its great to have a strong Christine and Raoul who can stand their ground against a top Phantom, it may not be a good idea to go for such a strange sweet sound if people notice how strong (a really good) Meg sounds by comparison - even if the contrast works really well at the end. On the other hand, Cardiff may have been a different show again. Personally, I liked JOJ more - as he hit both extremes of the emotions harder for me. I liked Earl though, and will be going to see the tour again. They have played around a lot with the characters and interactions, but although its interesting and great to have a Phantom and Christine who can do it, I don't think change is necessarily always evolutionary in a positive way. There are real trade offs between continuity and drama each time they decide to follow where some aspect of the script leads. Whats novel, but realistic with the script, does lead to some people sitting besides me saying why is he/ now doing that ? Personally, I still prefer the perms John or Earl did with Katie in London, and I think they got the most emotional audience response there - but that may also be because their vocals and the story in most perms just work so well in that intimate, aged, theatre setting.
#428
Posted 21 December 2012 - 04:48 PM
It's quite reflective, and well worth the 12.99 fee.
#429
Posted 28 December 2012 - 03:19 PM
musicalover, on 21 December 2012 - 04:48 PM, said:
It's quite reflective, and well worth the 12.99 fee.
I second this, I think it's an excellent album. Very moving, and a lovely thing for Simon to have done in tribute to his father.
A bright bright star will show the way.
Go to where the champions played."
#430
Posted 08 January 2013 - 06:11 PM
musicalover, on 21 December 2012 - 04:48 PM, said:
It's quite reflective, and well worth the 12.99 fee.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



















