Bricabrac, on 17 August 2012 - 11:40 PM, said:
There have been quite a few positive comments about the cast, especially the two leads.
Earl Jones, whom I liked better than JOJ in the original production, should also be quite good. Any guesses about how this production will fare with other, possibly lesser, leads?
Earl
Carpenter has already had a period playing the Phantom in London alongside Katie just before the tour started - and listening in the usual place they sounded great together to me. The tour's also got some strong understudies/alternates judging by comments and the net. As far as I have read, there are no other cast perms on the tour. I think they have been
very careful about casting their leads.
Its pretty subjective how much the current tour would work in other hands. .I think the tour leads go superbly with the tour version, and work well in London too. The entire cast was strong and worked for me - i didn't once feel anything was weaker than London - which I have with some tours. I may be right that other people wouldn't have the same impact on the tour, but I have no idea whether the audience as a whole would notice as much. l also think its inevitable that at some point in the future one of the up and coming male stars who are very good already as understudies and the like, will have to be promoted to Phantom - unless ALW does have a down on the males of the profession and keeps on flying people in when one of the top experienced Brits isn't available. I think thats going to be a very interesting time and it will be wrong to think of them as "lesser leads" .As someone said above, if you didn't have reviewers commenting on how good the leads were, they might be fiunding something else to write about - like chandaliers. How crucial that , or the quality of the product, is to sales though - compared to the fact that we are in an escalating recession - I have no idea.