Would people rather see Zoe Tyler back on the pannel next time rather than DVO, or both?
Who would b your ideal pannel?
0
-
This topic is locked
5 replies to this topic
#1
mjr
-
- Full Members
-
- 3137 posts
Advanced Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:London
Posted 21 May 2008 - 02:35 PM
#2
allthatjazz
-
- Full Members
-
- 536 posts
Advanced Member
- Gender:Female
- Location:hampshire
- Interests:I have the theatre bug!! My mission in life is to visit every theatre in london, which could take a while! My current favourites are Chicago, The Lion King and Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. <br /><br />I also enjoy reading and shopping.
Posted 21 May 2008 - 07:53 PM
QUOTE(mjr @ May 21 2008, 03:35 PM) 
Would people rather see Zoe Tyler back on the pannel next time rather than DVO, or both?
Who would b your ideal pannel?
Who would b your ideal pannel?
My ideal panel would be Ruthie Henshall, Zoe Tyler, Michael Ball and Lord Andrew Lloyd Webber
#3
M George
-
- Full Members
-
- 913 posts
Advanced Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:North West
Posted 21 May 2008 - 09:11 PM
I wouldn't like to see Zoe on the panel. I'd rather Claire Moore or someone similar go on the panel. Zoe Tyler makes comments such as 'It was a bit rubbish'. Extremely technical comment from a vocal coach.
I won't be called a baggage!
#4
mjr
-
- Full Members
-
- 3137 posts
Advanced Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:London
Posted 21 May 2008 - 09:50 PM
QUOTE(M George @ May 21 2008, 10:11 PM)
I wouldn't like to see Zoe on the panel. I'd rather Claire Moore or someone similar go on the panel. Zoe Tyler makes comments such as 'It was a bit rubbish'. Extremely technical comment from a vocal coach.
To the viewing public that can be the most effective way of getting what the pannel think over. Yes ok, maybe she should be more formal in her use of words, but are the joe public going to get what she means?
#5 Guest_Guest_*
Guest_Guest_*
-
- Guests
Posted 22 May 2008 - 07:00 AM
But they're not judging "joe public": the members of the panel are professionals judging other professionals. Why dumb down to the lowest common denominator? Raise standards, not lower them.
And I'd vote to keep John Barrowman on the panel. He's a man who KNOWS what he's talking about when it comes to the subject of MT.
And I'd vote to keep John Barrowman on the panel. He's a man who KNOWS what he's talking about when it comes to the subject of MT.
#6
rona910
-
- Full Members
-
- 202 posts
Advanced Member
- Gender:Female
- Location:Aberdeen...well, almost.
Posted 22 May 2008 - 09:07 AM
QUOTE(Guest @ May 22 2008, 08:00 AM)
But they're not judging "joe public": the members of the panel are professionals judging other professionals. Why dumb down to the lowest common denominator? Raise standards, not lower them.
And I'd vote to keep John Barrowman on the panel. He's a man who KNOWS what he's talking about when it comes to the subject of MT.
And I'd vote to keep John Barrowman on the panel. He's a man who KNOWS what he's talking about when it comes to the subject of MT.
I'd agree with that. He may not be THE most experienced person you could ask for but he knows what's needed, he's honest, isn't afraid to speak his mind but still appreciates he's on a TV show so makes it entertaining at the same time.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
