Jump to content


Treats


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
25 replies to this topic

#21 Snout

Snout

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 75 posts

Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:37 AM

In Standard as well. It has a bash at Kenwright, too.

#22 curzon

curzon

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 819 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:High Wycombe

Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:40 AM

QUOTE(Snout @ Mar 7 2007, 11:37 AM) View Post
In Standard as well. It has a bash at Kenwright, too.
I have no problem with people bashing Kenwright!  The more the merrier! wink.gif

Sebastian

#23 Backdrifter

Backdrifter

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 999 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:London
  • Interests:Moving, sleeping, eating, not being here

    Gender says 'not telling' but, clue: I own some Y chromosomes

Posted 07 March 2007 - 02:33 PM

QUOTE(curzon @ Mar 7 2007, 11:21 AM) View Post
That's if you believe everything that you read in the Daily Mail......

Quite. This is the paper that alleged Piper & Evans's wedding day was a wild whirlwind of excess and gambling, whereas in fact it was apparently 6 people having dinner and not doing much else. I wouldn't trust the Mail any further than I could spit out a copy of it.
Turn up the signal... wipe out the noise

#24 Snout

Snout

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 75 posts

Posted 07 March 2007 - 04:44 PM

Now it's being reported that the first night could be cancelled.
Can anyone involved with the Garrick or the show tell us what's going on? Maybe Kenwright himself could tell us? A bit of information would be welcome.

#25 Owen

Owen

    Advanced Member

  • Full Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 07 March 2007 - 11:29 PM

Just caught the last preview tonight. Not a badly acted play - in fact the actors redeem themselves better than the writer. It won't though be long until The garrick is seeking a new tenant as really at a loss as to how this one will run?

#26 Shaunyboy

Shaunyboy

    Newbie

  • Full Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 13 April 2007 - 07:15 PM

hmmm...how interesting.

I went to see Treats last night and I couldn't help but notice that the "paki" reference I mentioned in my previous post was not used this time round.
I guess somebody important must read this forum and take note of peoples comments.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users