Jo Caird: Where Are All the Older Performers? Date: 8 September 2011
Among my theatrical bêtes noires is young actors playing older characters for no good reason. At its best, on those occasions when the young actor in question is talented, this looks peculiar (Lucy Farrett, right, in Twenty Minutes to Nine is a good example of this). At its worst, when the audience is presented with a young person with talcum powder-dusted hair and drawn-on wrinkles, it's laughable and undermines the good work of the rest of the cast. Either way, it's a distraction from the drama and rarely excusable.
If you're a young company putting on a show and you don't have any older actors among your ranks, then opt to stage a play – either an existing piece or one of your own devising – with a dramatis personae entirely composed of young actors. If that doesn't appeal, cast an older actor from outside the group. Either way, your creative ambitions needn't be limited.
I saw plenty of this at the Edinburgh Fringe last month, and although it irritated me whenever I came across it, it did flag up an interesting issue: the lack of performers over the age of 35 (I'm defining 'older' as 35-plus here - please don't get upset with me about it, it's just for the sake of this argument and just for the record, I don't consider 35 old) at the festival, and in particular the underrepresentation of older women performers.
The Fringe is undoubtedly a young person's game and this shouldn't come as a big surprise. A major proportion of the companies at the festival each year are students or recent graduates after all, and the comedy programme is largely composed of bright young things trying to make a name for themselves. Young people are more likely to be ready to put up with the far from ideal living conditions at the Fringe (anyone who has slept in a cupboard or on a kitchen floor in an overcrowded flat to try to keep costs down will know what I'm talking about), and have fewer professional and personal commitments that might stop them from flitting off to Scotland for a month to mire themselves in debt.
In some respects, this demographic make-up is to the benefit of the festival: the enthusiasm of the thousands of young people at the Fringe makes it a very vibrant place, and there's a wonderful buzz that accompanies the discovery of exciting new work and careers taking off. But that's not the whole story. The fact that the Fringe is unfavourable to older theatre-makers and comics means that Edinburgh's arts offering is less diverse than it should be (for more on diversity at the Fringe, see below for producer Steve Roe's excellent blog on the subject) and audiences are missing out on the experience and talents of older artists.
What's even more troubling is that out of the limited numbers of older performers at the festival, women are horribly underrepresented, in both theatre and comedy. Out of the 40 or so shows I saw in Edinburgh in August (not really a fair sample I realise, but enough to allow me to comment anecdotally), I spotted only five women who I would estimate to be over the age of 35, although all but one only just scraped into that category. This compared to around 20 older male performers.
There are probably a number of possible explanations for this disparity, but I fear the chief reason is to do with the fact that in most families, even those in which both parents pursue careers in the liberal arts, it is still the woman who has primary responsibility over childcare, making a month away from home at the Fringe an impossibility. In single-parent families, it's even more difficult of course. That's not to say there aren't female performers who make this work, but they are few and far between. It all makes for a depressingly narrow set of options for female performers and audiences alike, and a situation that I fear is not going to improve any time soon given this government's fondness for budget cuts that affect women disproportionally and make it even harder for them to pursue careers after having children. Looks like I might have to reconcile myself to my old bête noire after all.
Any opinions expressed above do not represent the view of Whatsonstage.com nor any of its staff or contributors beyond the bylined author.
Jo Caird is a freelance arts journalist and has been deputy Off-West End editor of Whatsonstage.com since June 2009. Jo tweets at @JoCaird. Her personal website is JoCaird.com
"Death Takes A Lover" is currently on at The Red Hedgehog in Highgate. It's a new play by an unknown writer, but it contains three brilliant and juicy parts for actresses over the age of 40. I did not have any difficulty at all casting these parts. It was far harder to cast the one older male part. There are a lot of older actresses, very experienced ones, who would love to do fringe theatre, if the part is good enough. Often the older parts are minor parts, stereotypes of mothers or wives, and there are plenty opportunities in tv drama for parts like these, but youth is trendy and not many people care to explore the complexities of women over a certain age. It's not the actresses that are lacking. It's the parts. - Olivier Bosman
12 Nov 11
You also missed Swimming with my Mother, Conversations with Carmel, An instinct fr Kindness and Pip Utton's performances as Hitler (apologies Pip to classify you as an older performer). Each show as hugely different as the performers present; each show simply beautiful - particularly the first two in how they illustrated the intergenerational love and sharing. More of this please! - C Daly
01 Oct 11
Speaking as an actress *cough* over 35, I can state that there are those of us who would relish the opportunity to work on a fringe show. It would make a nice change from the fact that decent roles for a woman of that age are often few and far between, and as you've pointed out, the roles that are there regularly have absurdly young actresses cast inappropriately. Come on people, give us 35-and-upwards actresses who are up for a challenge a fair crack at it! - Deborah McEwan
08 Sep 11
Love Kate Winslet but it was ridiculous her playing an old woman in The Reader, great film though it was.
On the Fringe(s) when you cast a show you get about 50 brilliant applicants for each role under 30 and about 2 unsuitable ones for each over 40. There are more young performers about, because they haven't yet quit or got famous or have a family to support - you don't get very rich performing in a London fringe show, and you generally get poorer performing in most Edinburgh ones.
So unless you fancy setting up a bursary for older performers on the Fringe, you're stuck with this - and it's a bete noir for me too?
When it comes to touring, again it's easy to cast free and easy young actors - AND actually it's not so hard to cast actors from late middle age onwards. It's the middle aged, family-making, have-to-take-the-telly-job demographic that are hardest. - Jon Bradfield
08 Sep 11
You clearly missed out on The Golden Dragon which featured Annie Firbank, who is, without giving away secrets in her 70s. She played the whole festival at Traverse and is now on tour with the show, in London and present and around the country in October. I agree that older characters are not always played by the age ranges they should be but Actors Touring Company is leading the charge here! - Nick Williams
Whatsonstage.com - Discount London theatre tickets, theatre news and reviews, Theatre videos, Theatre discussion, National Theatre Listings. Covering London's West End, all of Theatreland and all UK theatre. The best
for London Theatre Ticket Discounts.